StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Svelte vs jQuery

Svelte vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K

Svelte vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Svelte and jQuery.

  1. Performance: One of the major differences between Svelte and jQuery is their approach to performance. Svelte is a compile-time framework, which means that it converts the code into highly efficient JavaScript during the build process. This helps in reducing the size of the final JavaScript bundle and improving the overall performance of the application. On the other hand, jQuery operates at runtime and relies on traversing the DOM to manipulate elements, which can have a performance impact, especially in large applications.

  2. Size: Another important difference is the size of the libraries. Svelte is a lightweight framework, with its core library being only a few kilobytes in size. This makes it ideal for building small, fast applications. On the other hand, jQuery is a larger library, with its minified version being around 84 kilobytes. This can have an impact on the loading time of the website, especially on slower network connections.

  3. Reactivity: Svelte has built-in reactivity, which means that any changes made to the data are automatically reflected in the DOM. This allows developers to write code that is more declarative and easier to reason about. In contrast, jQuery does not have built-in reactivity and developers need to manually update the DOM when the data changes. This can lead to more verbose and error-prone code.

  4. Component-based architecture: Svelte promotes a component-based architecture, where UI elements are encapsulated within reusable components. This encourages modular code and makes it easier to manage and maintain complex applications. On the other hand, jQuery does not have a built-in component system and developers need to manually manage the state and behavior of UI elements.

  5. Browser support: Svelte supports modern browsers and does not require any additional polyfills or libraries. It takes advantage of new JavaScript features, such as reactive programming and template literals. On the other hand, jQuery has good backward compatibility and supports older browsers, making it a suitable choice for projects that need to target a wide range of browsers.

  6. Learning curve: Svelte has a steeper learning curve compared to jQuery. Svelte introduces new concepts and syntax, such as reactive statements and stores, which may require some time for developers to become familiar with. On the other hand, jQuery has a simpler syntax and a large community that provides extensive documentation and resources, making it easier for beginners to get started.

In summary, Svelte and jQuery differ in terms of performance, size, reactivity, component-based architecture, browser support, and learning curve. Svelte focuses on high performance and efficient code generation, while jQuery offers backward compatibility and a simpler syntax.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, Svelte

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Peter
Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.5k views72.5k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
Svelte
Svelte

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

-
Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
70.6K
Followers
1.6K
Votes
6.6K
Votes
502
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Hard to learn

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Svelte?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preact

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase