StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Umbrella JS vs jQuery

Umbrella JS vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Umbrella JS
Umbrella JS
Stacks2
Followers14
Votes0

Umbrella JS vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown, we will provide key differences between Umbrella JS and jQuery. Umbrella JS is a lightweight JavaScript library, while jQuery is a feature-rich JavaScript library.

  1. File Size: Umbrella JS is significantly smaller in file size compared to jQuery. Umbrella JS has a file size of about 4KB, making it ideal for websites that require fast loading times. On the other hand, jQuery has a larger file size of about 85KB, which may impact page loading speed.

  2. API Design Philosophy: Umbrella JS follows a minimalist design philosophy, aiming to provide only the essential functionalities required for DOM manipulation and event handling. It focuses on simplicity and lightweight performance. In contrast, jQuery offers a comprehensive set of functionalities, including CSS manipulation, AJAX requests, and animation effects, making it suitable for complex web applications.

  3. Browser Compatibility: Umbrella JS has wider browser compatibility compared to jQuery. It supports modern browsers as well as older versions of Internet Explorer, which may still be required in some cases. jQuery, on the other hand, dropped support for older versions of Internet Explorer in version 2.0, focusing only on modern browser compatibility.

  4. Plugin Ecosystem: jQuery has a vast and mature plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of third-party plugins for various functionalities like form validation, image sliders, and date pickers. Umbrella JS, being a lightweight library, has a smaller plugin ecosystem with limited options.

  5. Learning Curve: Umbrella JS has a smaller API surface and a simpler syntax compared to jQuery. This makes it easier to learn and understand for developers who are new to JavaScript libraries. jQuery, with its comprehensive set of functionalities, has a steeper learning curve and requires more time and effort to master.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: jQuery has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It has been around for a long time and is widely adopted, making it easier to find solutions to common problems. Umbrella JS, being a relatively newer library, has a smaller community and fewer resources available.

In summary, Umbrella JS is a lightweight, minimalist JavaScript library with a smaller file size, simpler syntax, wider browser compatibility, and easier learning curve compared to jQuery. However, jQuery offers a more extensive set of functionalities, a mature plugin ecosystem, and a larger community support. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the developer's preference for simplicity or comprehensive features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, Umbrella JS

Peter
Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.5k views72.5k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
Umbrella JS
Umbrella JS

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Covers your javascript needs for those rainy days. A <3kb performant jQuery-like library born from the question: You might not need jQuery, then what do you need? You probably need awesome CSS (like Picnic CSS) and a lightweight, modern and performant javascript library. This does: DOM traversal (selector, filter, find, each, etc.) DOM editing (classes & attributes, html, before, etc.) Event handling

-
Intuitive and Documented; Tiny and Clear; Tested and Performant
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
2
Followers
70.6K
Followers
14
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Umbrella JS?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase