Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Umbrella JS vs jQuery: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown, we will provide key differences between Umbrella JS and jQuery. Umbrella JS is a lightweight JavaScript library, while jQuery is a feature-rich JavaScript library.
File Size: Umbrella JS is significantly smaller in file size compared to jQuery. Umbrella JS has a file size of about 4KB, making it ideal for websites that require fast loading times. On the other hand, jQuery has a larger file size of about 85KB, which may impact page loading speed.
API Design Philosophy: Umbrella JS follows a minimalist design philosophy, aiming to provide only the essential functionalities required for DOM manipulation and event handling. It focuses on simplicity and lightweight performance. In contrast, jQuery offers a comprehensive set of functionalities, including CSS manipulation, AJAX requests, and animation effects, making it suitable for complex web applications.
Browser Compatibility: Umbrella JS has wider browser compatibility compared to jQuery. It supports modern browsers as well as older versions of Internet Explorer, which may still be required in some cases. jQuery, on the other hand, dropped support for older versions of Internet Explorer in version 2.0, focusing only on modern browser compatibility.
Plugin Ecosystem: jQuery has a vast and mature plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of third-party plugins for various functionalities like form validation, image sliders, and date pickers. Umbrella JS, being a lightweight library, has a smaller plugin ecosystem with limited options.
Learning Curve: Umbrella JS has a smaller API surface and a simpler syntax compared to jQuery. This makes it easier to learn and understand for developers who are new to JavaScript libraries. jQuery, with its comprehensive set of functionalities, has a steeper learning curve and requires more time and effort to master.
Community Support and Documentation: jQuery has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It has been around for a long time and is widely adopted, making it easier to find solutions to common problems. Umbrella JS, being a relatively newer library, has a smaller community and fewer resources available.
In summary, Umbrella JS is a lightweight, minimalist JavaScript library with a smaller file size, simpler syntax, wider browser compatibility, and easier learning curve compared to jQuery. However, jQuery offers a more extensive set of functionalities, a mature plugin ecosystem, and a larger community support. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the developer's preference for simplicity or comprehensive features.
I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.
I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of Umbrella JS
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2