Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

JSON

1.9K
1.6K
+ 1
9
Ruby

41.1K
21.2K
+ 1
4K
Add tool

JSON vs Ruby: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between JSON and Ruby. JSON stands for JavaScript Object Notation, and it is a lightweight data interchange format. Ruby, on the other hand, is a dynamic, object-oriented programming language. Understanding the differences between JSON and Ruby is essential when working with data in web development.

  1. Syntax: JSON follows a strict syntax where keys and strings must be enclosed in double quotes. All values need to be one of the following data types: string, number, object, array, boolean, or null. Ruby, on the other hand, has a more flexible syntax that allows for the use of both single and double quotes. Also, Ruby supports additional data types like symbols and regular expressions.

  2. Data Structure: JSON is primarily used for representing and transmitting structured data. It is based on a key-value pair structure where keys are always strings. Values can be simple data types or nested objects/arrays. In Ruby, data structures are more versatile and can include arrays, hashes, and custom objects. Ruby provides a wide range of built-in methods and functionalities for manipulating these data structures.

  3. Parsing and Serialization: JSON is a standardized format that can easily be parsed and serialized by a variety of programming languages. Almost all modern programming languages, including Ruby, provide built-in support for parsing JSON data and converting it into native data types. Ruby has its own JSON module that allows developers to parse and generate JSON.

  4. Interoperability: JSON is widely used for data interchange between different systems and applications because of its simplicity and ease of implementation. It is language-agnostic and can be easily understood by most programming languages. Ruby, being a programming language, offers a wider range of functionalities beyond just data interchange. Ruby can be used for web development, scripting, and many other purposes.

  5. Typing: JSON is a loosely typed format, which means that data types can be dynamically inferred from the values. Ruby, on the other hand, follows a strong typing system, where variables have a specific type assigned to them. This allows for better type safety and prevents unexpected runtime errors.

  6. Encoding Support: JSON supports Unicode characters, allowing data to be represented in different languages and character sets. Ruby also has excellent support for Unicode characters and provides various encoding mechanisms for handling different character encodings.

In summary, JSON and Ruby have distinct differences in terms of syntax, data structures, parsing, interoperability, typing, and encoding support. Understanding these differences is crucial for efficiently working with JSON data and utilizing the features offered by the Ruby programming language.

Advice on JSON and Ruby
Needs advice
on
JSONJSON
and
PythonPython

Hi. Currently, I have a requirement where I have to create a new JSON file based on the input CSV file, validate the generated JSON file, and upload the JSON file into the application (which runs in AWS) using API. Kindly suggest the best language that can meet the above requirement. I feel Python will be better, but I am not sure with the justification of why python. Can you provide your views on this?

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
PythonPython

Python is very flexible and definitely up the job (although, in reality, any language will be able to cope with this task!). Python has some good libraries built in, and also some third party libraries that will help here. 1. Convert CSV -> JSON 2. Validate against a schema 3. Deploy to AWS

  1. The builtins include json and csv libraries, and, depending on the complexity of the csv file, it is fairly simple to convert:
import csv
import json

with open("your_input.csv", "r") as f:
    csv_as_dict = list(csv.DictReader(f))[0]

with open("your_output.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(csv_as_dict, f)
  1. The validation part is handled nicely by this library: https://pypi.org/project/jsonschema/ It allows you to create a schema and check whether what you have created works for what you want to do. It is based on the json schema standard, allowing annotation and validation of any json

  2. It as an AWS library to automate the upload - or in fact do pretty much anything with AWS - from within your codebase: https://aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-python/ This will handle authentication to AWS and uploading / deploying the file to wherever it needs to go.

A lot depends on the last two pieces, but the converting itself is really pretty neat.

See more
Recommends
on
GolangGolang

I would use Go. Since CSV files are flat (no hierarchy), you could use the encoding/csv package to read each row, and write out the values as JSON. See https://medium.com/@ankurraina/reading-a-simple-csv-in-go-36d7a269cecd. You just have to figure out in advance what the key is for each row.

See more
Max Musing
Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 1 upvotes · 289.3K views
Recommends
on
Node.jsNode.js
at

This should be pretty doable in any language. Go with whatever you're most familiar with.

That being said, there's a case to be made for using Node.js since it's trivial to convert an object to JSON and vice versa.

See more
Decisions about JSON and Ruby
Andrew Carpenter
Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC · | 16 upvotes · 402.7K views

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

See more
Thomas Miller
Talent Co-Ordinator at Tessian · | 16 upvotes · 229.4K views

In December we successfully flipped around half a billion monthly API requests from our Ruby on Rails application to some new Python 3 applications. Our Head of Engineering has written a great article as to why we decided to transition from Ruby on Rails to Python 3! Read more about it in the link below.

See more
Mike Fiedler
Enterprise Architect at Warby Parker · | 3 upvotes · 220.8K views

When I was evaluating languages to write this app in, I considered either Python or JavaScript at the time. I find Ruby very pleasant to read and write, and the Ruby community has built out a wide variety of test tools and approaches, helping e deliver better software faster. Along with Rails, and the Ruby-first Heroku support, this was an easy decision.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of JSON
Pros of Ruby
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Widely supported
  • 605
    Programme friendly
  • 536
    Quick to develop
  • 490
    Great community
  • 468
    Productivity
  • 432
    Simplicity
  • 273
    Open source
  • 234
    Meta-programming
  • 207
    Powerful
  • 156
    Blocks
  • 139
    Powerful one-liners
  • 69
    Flexible
  • 58
    Easy to learn
  • 51
    Easy to start
  • 42
    Maintainability
  • 37
    Lambdas
  • 30
    Procs
  • 21
    Fun to write
  • 19
    Diverse web frameworks
  • 13
    Reads like English
  • 10
    Makes me smarter and happier
  • 9
    Rails
  • 8
    Very Dynamic
  • 8
    Elegant syntax
  • 6
    Matz
  • 5
    Object Oriented
  • 5
    Programmer happiness
  • 4
    Elegant code
  • 4
    Generally fun but makes you wanna cry sometimes
  • 4
    Friendly
  • 4
    Fun and useful
  • 3
    Easy packaging and modules
  • 3
    There are so many ways to make it do what you want
  • 2
    Primitive types can be tampered with

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of JSON
Cons of Ruby
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 7
      Memory hog
    • 7
      Really slow if you're not really careful
    • 3
      Nested Blocks can make code unreadable
    • 2
      Encouraging imperative programming
    • 1
      Ambiguous Syntax, such as function parentheses

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is JSON?

    JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.

    What is Ruby?

    Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use JSON?
    What companies use Ruby?
    See which teams inside your own company are using JSON or Ruby.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with JSON?
    What tools integrate with Ruby?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Nov 20 2019 at 3:38AM

    OneSignal

    PostgreSQLRedisRuby+8
    9
    4639
    Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

    AppSignal

    JavaScriptNode.jsJava+8
    5
    953
    Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

    Segment

    PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
    7
    2555
    Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

    AppSignal

    RedisRubyKafka+9
    15
    1638
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    40
    36244
    What are some alternatives to JSON and Ruby?
    YAML
    A human-readable data-serialization language. It is commonly used for configuration files, but could be used in many applications where data is being stored or transmitted.
    Protobuf
    Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.
    Avro
    It is a row-oriented remote procedure call and data serialization framework developed within Apache's Hadoop project. It uses JSON for defining data types and protocols, and serializes data in a compact binary format.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    OData
    It is an ISO/IEC approved, OASIS standard that defines a set of best practices for building and consuming RESTful APIs. It helps you focus on your business logic while building RESTful APIs without having to worry about the various approaches to define request and response headers, status codes, HTTP methods, URL conventions, media types, payload formats, query options, etc.
    See all alternatives