Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs Lens: What are the differences?
Kubernetes vs Lens
Kubernetes and Lens are two powerful tools used in the field of containerization and orchestration. While both aim to simplify the management of container-based applications, they have some key differences.
Scope and Functionality: Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that provides features for deploying, scaling, and managing containerized applications. It focuses on managing the infrastructure and automating tasks related to container deployment. On the other hand, Lens is a Kubernetes IDE (Integrated Development Environment) that provides a user-friendly interface for interacting with Kubernetes clusters. It allows users to visualize and manage clusters, as well as perform various tasks such as editing YAML files and monitoring applications.
User Interface: Kubernetes primarily utilizes a command-line interface (CLI) to manage clusters and applications. While it offers a level of flexibility and fine-grained control, it can be complex for users who are not comfortable with the command line. In contrast, Lens offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that provides a more intuitive and visually appealing way to interact with Kubernetes. It allows users to access all the functionality of Kubernetes through a friendly and easy-to-use interface.
Features and Tools: Kubernetes provides a wide range of features and tools for managing containerized applications, including deployment strategies, scaling options, resource allocation, and monitoring capabilities. It also supports the integration of third-party tools for networking, storage, and logging. Lens, on the other hand, focuses on providing an enhanced user experience for working with Kubernetes. It offers additional features such as a real-time dashboard, cluster management, and application templates, which further simplify the management of Kubernetes clusters.
Multi-Cluster Management: Kubernetes allows users to manage multiple clusters simultaneously through its CLI or other management tools. It provides features for controlling and monitoring multiple clusters from a centralized location. Lens takes multi-cluster management to the next level by offering a dedicated workspace for managing multiple clusters. It allows users to switch between different clusters seamlessly and provides a unified view of all the clusters and their applications.
Ecosystem and Community: Kubernetes has a vast ecosystem and a strong community backing, which means there is a wide range of plugins, integrations, and support available. It is continuously updated and improved by contributors and maintained by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). While Lens does not have the same level of ecosystem and community as Kubernetes, it has been gaining popularity and has an active open-source community that actively contributes to its development.
Deployment and Setup: Deploying and setting up a Kubernetes cluster requires some level of technical expertise and infrastructure management skills. It involves configuring the cluster, defining resources, and managing networking and storage. On the other hand, deploying and setting up Lens is relatively straightforward. It can be installed as a standalone application on the user's machine and connected to one or more Kubernetes clusters for management.
In summary, Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing containerized applications, while Lens is an IDE that provides an enhanced user experience for interacting with Kubernetes. Lens offers a graphical user interface, additional features, and multi-cluster management capabilities, making it a powerful tool for Kubernetes administration.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution164
- Simple and powerful128
- Open source106
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Cheap8
- Simple8
- Self-healing6
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Runs on azure3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Custom and extensibility3
- Sfg2
- Gke2
- Everything of CaaS2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
Pros of Lens
- Keep track of cluster changes4
- Easy management of multiple clusters2
- Open Source2
- Local installation, not SaaS1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1