Kubernetes vs LXD

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

58.5K
50.6K
+ 1
677
LXD

104
194
+ 1
68
Add tool

Kubernetes vs LXD: What are the differences?

Kubernetes vs LXD

Kubernetes and LXD are both popular containerization technologies used for managing and deploying applications. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that make each suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that manages a cluster of nodes and containers, while LXD is a system container manager that runs containers as lightweight virtual machines. This means that LXD provides more isolation and performance advantages, as it operates at the system level rather than at the application level like Kubernetes.

  2. Scope: Kubernetes is designed to manage large-scale distributed systems and is commonly used for deploying microservices architectures, whereas LXD is focused on providing a lightweight and user-friendly experience for running Linux containers. LXD is often used for creating development environments and running individual containers or small-scale applications.

  3. Networking: Kubernetes provides a networking model that allows containers to communicate with each other across different nodes in a cluster. It includes features like service discovery, load balancing, and network policies. On the other hand, LXD does not have built-in networking features and relies on the underlying host network configuration for container communication.

  4. Orchestration: Kubernetes offers powerful features for automating the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It supports features such as automatic scaling, rolling updates, and service discovery. LXD, on the other hand, focuses more on the management of containers themselves rather than the applications running inside them.

  5. Cluster Management: Kubernetes provides robust cluster management capabilities, allowing users to deploy and manage a cluster of nodes across multiple machines. It includes features like self-healing, automatic scaling, and load balancing. LXD, on the other hand, is more lightweight and is typically used for managing containers on a single host or a small number of hosts.

  6. Use Cases: Due to their architectural differences, Kubernetes is commonly used in production environments to manage complex, scalable applications that require high availability and fault tolerance. LXD, on the other hand, is often used for development and testing purposes, as well as for running lightweight applications or containers that require strong isolation.

In summary, Kubernetes is a powerful container orchestration platform suitable for managing large-scale distributed systems, while LXD is a lightweight and user-friendly system container manager focused on providing isolation and performance advantages for running individual containers or small-scale applications.

Decisions about Kubernetes and LXD
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 414.7K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of LXD
  • 164
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 128
    Simple and powerful
  • 106
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Best
  • 7
    Cluster
  • 5
    Multiprocess isolation (not single)
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    I like the goal of the LXD and found it to work great
  • 4
    Full OS isolation
  • 3
    Container
  • 3
    More stateful than docker
  • 2
    Systemctl compatibility

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Kubernetes
Cons of LXD
  • 16
    Steep learning curve
  • 15
    Poor workflow for development
  • 8
    Orchestrates only infrastructure
  • 4
    High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
  • 2
    Too heavy for simple systems
  • 1
    Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
  • 1
    More moving parts to secure
  • 1
    Additional Technology Overhead
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Kubernetes?

    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

    What is LXD?

    LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Kubernetes?
    What companies use LXD?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Kubernetes or LXD.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
    What tools integrate with LXD?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Kubernetesetcd+2
    2
    1159
    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2355
    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1101
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    5
    1495
    Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesRancher+2
    2
    934
    What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and LXD?
    Docker Swarm
    Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
    Nomad
    Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
    OpenStack
    OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
    Rancher
    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
    Docker Compose
    With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
    See all alternatives