Kubernetes vs Mesosphere

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

58.7K
50.4K
+ 1
677
Mesosphere

80
108
+ 1
6
Add tool

Kubernetes vs Mesosphere: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of container management platforms, Kubernetes and Mesosphere are two prominent options that offer distinct features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these platforms can help organizations make informed decisions about which solution best suits their needs.

  1. Architecture: Kubernetes follows a container orchestration model characterized by a master node that manages multiple worker nodes. In contrast, Mesosphere utilizes the DC/OS (Datacenter Operating System) architecture, which includes a unified resource pool to manage containers and other applications, offering a more comprehensive approach to workload management.

  2. Scalability: Kubernetes is known for its scalability and allows for horizontal scaling of containerized applications by adding more worker nodes to the cluster. Mesosphere, on the other hand, provides scalability through the use of Apache Mesos, enabling efficient resource allocation across diverse workloads and supporting large-scale deployments with ease.

  3. Ease of Use: Kubernetes is regarded for its simplicity and ease of use, making it popular among developers for managing containerized applications effectively. In comparison, Mesosphere offers a more complex setup due to its versatile capabilities, which may require additional resources and expertise to operate efficiently.

  4. Community Support: Kubernetes boasts a large and active open-source community that continuously contributes to its development and enhancement. Mesosphere also has a supportive community; however, its user base may be relatively smaller compared to Kubernetes, potentially impacting the availability of resources and community-driven solutions.

  5. Compatibility: Kubernetes is compatible with various cloud providers and on-premises environments, offering flexibility in deployment options. Mesosphere, while adaptable to multiple environments, is particularly well-suited for enterprises seeking a unified platform for managing diverse workloads across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

  6. Cost Considerations: In terms of cost, Kubernetes is often favored for its cost-effectiveness and minimal resource requirements, providing a practical solution for organizations with budget constraints. Mesosphere, with its advanced features and comprehensive management capabilities, may involve higher operational costs and resource investments.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Kubernetes and Mesosphere is crucial for organizations seeking the optimal container management platform that aligns with their specific requirements and operational objectives.

Decisions about Kubernetes and Mesosphere
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of Mesosphere
  • 164
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 128
    Simple and powerful
  • 106
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 6
    Devops

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Kubernetes
Cons of Mesosphere
  • 16
    Steep learning curve
  • 15
    Poor workflow for development
  • 8
    Orchestrates only infrastructure
  • 4
    High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
  • 2
    Too heavy for simple systems
  • 1
    Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
  • 1
    More moving parts to secure
  • 1
    Additional Technology Overhead
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Kubernetes?

    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

    What is Mesosphere?

    Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Kubernetes?
    What companies use Mesosphere?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Kubernetes or Mesosphere.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
    What tools integrate with Mesosphere?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Kubernetesetcd+2
    2
    1154
    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2352
    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1096
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    5
    1488
    Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesRancher+2
    2
    929
    What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and Mesosphere?
    Docker Swarm
    Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
    Nomad
    Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
    OpenStack
    OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
    Rancher
    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
    Docker Compose
    With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
    See all alternatives