Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs Minikube: What are the differences?
Kubernetes and Minikube are two popular tools used for managing containerized applications. While both are used in the context of containers and orchestration, there are key differences between the two.
Deployment Scale: Kubernetes is designed for large-scale deployments across multiple nodes and clusters, making it suitable for managing complex and distributed environments. On the other hand, Minikube is a lightweight and simplified version of Kubernetes, primarily used for local development and testing purposes. It allows developers to run a single-node Kubernetes cluster on their local machines.
Resource Requirements: Kubernetes requires a significant amount of resources to operate efficiently, as it is intended for managing large-scale deployments. It needs multiple nodes and clusters for full functionality, making it more suitable for production environments. In contrast, Minikube is designed to run on a single machine with minimal resource requirements, making it ideal for local development or running Kubernetes on a small scale.
Infrastructure Flexibility: Kubernetes can be deployed on various cloud providers, such as AWS, Google Cloud Platform, and Azure, allowing users to take advantage of their preferred infrastructure. It also supports on-premises deployments. On the other hand, Minikube is primarily focused on running on local machines and supports only a limited set of drivers for virtualization or containerization, such as VirtualBox, VMware, and Docker.
Networking and Load Balancing: Kubernetes offers a highly configurable and advanced networking model that enables seamless connectivity between containers and services. It provides various options for load balancing and exposes services externally through an ingress controller. In contrast, Minikube simplifies networking by using a single-node configuration with a basic networking setup, limiting its capabilities for complex network configurations.
Cluster Management: Kubernetes provides extensive cluster management features, including scaling applications, managing updates, and handling node failures. It also offers sophisticated scheduling and resource allocation mechanisms. Minikube, being a lightweight tool, lacks some of these advanced cluster management capabilities. It focuses more on providing a simplified local environment rather than comprehensive cluster management.
Ecosystem and Community Support: Kubernetes has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of tools and resources available. It is widely adopted by organizations and benefits from ongoing development and enhancements. Minikube, although part of the Kubernetes ecosystem, has a smaller community and is more focused on providing a lightweight development environment.
In summary, Kubernetes is a powerful and feature-rich platform for managing large-scale containerized applications, suitable for production environments and complex deployments. Minikube, on the other hand, is a lightweight tool primarily used for local development and testing, offering simplicity and ease of use.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Pros of minikube
- Let's me test k8s config locally1
- Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment1
- Easy setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1