Lando vs Rancher

Overview

Rancher

Stacks952

Followers1.5K

Votes644

Lando

Stacks89

Followers63

Votes4

GitHub Stars4.2K

Forks530

Lando vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Deployment Management: Lando focuses on managing local development environments, allowing developers to easily create, share, and manage development environments locally. On the other hand, Rancher primarily focuses on managing production Kubernetes clusters and cloud infrastructure for deploying applications at scale.
Container Orchestration: Rancher provides robust container orchestration capabilities, supporting various orchestrators like Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Apache Mesos. Lando, on the other hand, does not offer native container orchestration features but enables developers to quickly set up and manage local development environments without dealing with complex configurations.
Multi-Cloud Support: Rancher offers multi-cloud support, allowing users to manage resources across different cloud providers seamlessly. In contrast, Lando is designed for local development purposes and does not provide features for managing resources across multiple cloud environments.
Monitoring and Logging: Rancher includes built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, providing users with insights into application performance and health. Lando, being focused on local development, does not offer advanced monitoring and logging features but can be integrated with external monitoring tools for better visibility.
Scalability: Rancher is suitable for large-scale deployments and provides features for scaling applications horizontally and vertically, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-grade projects. Lando, on the other hand, is more suited for individual developers or small teams working on local development projects and may not offer the same level of scalability as Rancher.
Community and Support: Rancher has a larger community and active support from the developer community, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of resources for users. Lando also has a supportive community but may not be as extensive as Rancher, making it slightly less favorable in terms of community-backed resources and support.

In Summary, Lando and Rancher differ in terms of deployment management, container orchestration, multi-cloud support, monitoring and logging capabilities, scalability, and community and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher	Lando
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.	It's a free, open source, cross-platform, local development environment and DevOps tool built on Docker container technology and developed by Tandem. Designed to work with most major languages, frameworks and services, it provides an easy way for developers of all skill levels to specify simple or complex requirements for their projects, and then quickly get to work on them.
Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management	Mimicking your production environment locally; Integrating with hosting providers like Pantheon; Running CI tests locally, running local tests in CI
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 530
Stacks 952	Stacks 89
Followers 1.5K	Followers 63
Votes 644	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 103 Easy to use 79 Open source and totally free 63 Multi-host docker-compose support 58 Load balancing and health check included 58 Simple Cons 10 Hosting Rancher can be complicated	Pros 2 Open source 2 Multi containers
Integrations
Jenkins Datadog Google Compute Engine Docker Compose Amazon EC2 DigitalOcean GitHub Docker Kubernetes Drone.io	Linux Drupal WordPress Windows Mac OS X Joomla!

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Lando?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Lando vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Deployment Management: Lando focuses on managing local development environments, allowing developers to easily create, share, and manage development environments locally. On the other hand, Rancher primarily focuses on managing production Kubernetes clusters and cloud infrastructure for deploying applications at scale.
Container Orchestration: Rancher provides robust container orchestration capabilities, supporting various orchestrators like Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Apache Mesos. Lando, on the other hand, does not offer native container orchestration features but enables developers to quickly set up and manage local development environments without dealing with complex configurations.
Multi-Cloud Support: Rancher offers multi-cloud support, allowing users to manage resources across different cloud providers seamlessly. In contrast, Lando is designed for local development purposes and does not provide features for managing resources across multiple cloud environments.
Monitoring and Logging: Rancher includes built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, providing users with insights into application performance and health. Lando, being focused on local development, does not offer advanced monitoring and logging features but can be integrated with external monitoring tools for better visibility.
Scalability: Rancher is suitable for large-scale deployments and provides features for scaling applications horizontally and vertically, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-grade projects. Lando, on the other hand, is more suited for individual developers or small teams working on local development projects and may not offer the same level of scalability as Rancher.
Community and Support: Rancher has a larger community and active support from the developer community, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of resources for users. Lando also has a supportive community but may not be as extensive as Rancher, making it slightly less favorable in terms of community-backed resources and support.

In Summary, Lando and Rancher differ in terms of deployment management, container orchestration, multi-cloud support, monitoring and logging capabilities, scalability, and community and support.

Lando vs Rancher

Overview