StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Static Type Checkers
  5. Lodash vs TypeScript

Lodash vs TypeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TypeScript
TypeScript
Stacks105.1K
Followers74.2K
Votes503
GitHub Stars106.6K
Forks13.1K
Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K

Lodash vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lodash and TypeScript are both commonly used technologies in web development. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this markdown, I will outline the key differences between Lodash and TypeScript.

  1. Language vs Library: The most fundamental difference between Lodash and TypeScript is that Lodash is a JavaScript library, while TypeScript is a programming language. Lodash provides a set of utility functions that enhance JavaScript's functionality, while TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that introduces static typing and additional features.

  2. Functional Programming vs Type Safety: Lodash is primarily focused on providing utility functions for functional programming, such as array manipulation, iteration, and object manipulation. On the other hand, TypeScript is focused on adding static typing to JavaScript, which allows for better code organization, error prevention, and improved tooling.

  3. Compatibility: Lodash can be used with any JavaScript project, regardless of the programming language being used. It provides a wide range of utility functions that can be used in both JavaScript and TypeScript projects. On the other hand, TypeScript is specifically designed for JavaScript projects and is not compatible with other programming languages.

  4. Development Environment: Lodash can be used directly in any JavaScript environment without any additional setup. It can be installed using package managers like npm or included as a script in HTML files. On the other hand, TypeScript requires a development environment that supports TypeScript compilation, such as an IDE like Visual Studio Code or a build system like Webpack.

  5. Static Typing: TypeScript introduces static typing, allowing developers to specify the types of variables, function arguments, and return types. This enables better code validation and tooling, as well as improved code documentation. Lodash, being a JavaScript library, does not have built-in support for static typing.

  6. Code Complexity: Lodash provides a wide range of utility functions that can simplify common programming tasks. It reduces code complexity by providing well-tested and optimized functions for common operations. In contrast, TypeScript introduces additional complexity due to its static typing system, requiring developers to define types and handle type conversion.

In summary, Lodash is a JavaScript library that focuses on providing utility functions for functional programming, while TypeScript is a programming language that introduces static typing to JavaScript, enhancing code organization and error prevention. Lodash can be used with any JavaScript project, while TypeScript requires specific development environments and is not compatible with other programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TypeScript, Lodash

Jarvis
Jarvis

May 16, 2019

ReviewonTypeScriptTypeScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k
Comments
David
David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

ReviewonJavaScriptJavaScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)TypeScriptTypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Aug 13, 2019

Needs adviceonTypeScriptTypeScriptCoffeeScriptCoffeeScriptJavaScriptJavaScript

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

405k views405k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TypeScript
TypeScript
Lodash
Lodash

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
106.6K
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Forks
13.1K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
Stacks
105.1K
Stacks
10.7K
Followers
74.2K
Followers
886
Votes
503
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 173
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 105
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
Cons
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to TypeScript, Lodash?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase