StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Scalyr vs logagent

Scalyr vs logagent

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scalyr
Scalyr
Stacks40
Followers59
Votes12
Logagent
Logagent
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars390
Forks78

Scalyr vs logagent: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In comparing Scalyr and logagent, several key differences stand out that can help users make an informed decision on which logging tool best suits their needs.

## 1. Scalability:
Scalyr is known for its ability to handle massive amounts of data and high ingest rates, making it ideal for large-scale applications with extensive logging requirements. On the other hand, logagent may struggle to keep up with the same level of scalability due to limitations in its architecture.

## 2. Ease of Use:
Scalyr boasts a user-friendly interface, streamlined query language, and intuitive navigation features, making it easier for users to search and analyze log data effectively. Logagent, while functional, may lack the same level of user experience enhancements, potentially requiring a steeper learning curve for new users.

## 3. Advanced Analytics:
Scalyr offers advanced analytics capabilities such as trend analysis, anomaly detection, and real-time monitoring to help users derive valuable insights from their log data. In contrast, logagent may have more limited analytics features, making it less suitable for organizations that require in-depth data analysis.

## 4. Integration Options:
Scalyr supports a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services, enabling users to streamline their logging workflows and consolidate data from various sources. Logagent, while offering some integration options, may not have the same breadth of compatibility with external platforms.

## 5. Pricing Model:
Scalyr's pricing model is more transparent and flexible, with options for both pay-as-you-go and volume-based pricing plans to cater to different budget requirements. Logagent's pricing structure may be less flexible or customizable, potentially posing challenges for organizations with specific budget constraints.

## 6. Data Retention Policies:
Scalyr provides robust data retention policies and storage options, allowing users to manage and store log data for extended periods as needed. In comparison, logagent's data retention capabilities may be more limited or require additional configuration to meet specific retention requirements.

In Summary, Scalyr offers superior scalability, advanced analytics, and integration options, and a more flexible pricing model compared to logagent, making it a preferred choice for organizations with demanding logging needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scalyr
Scalyr
Logagent
Logagent

Scalyr is log search and management so fast you actually use it. Custom dashboards, graphs, alerts and log parsers allow you to monitor what's important to you. We're proud to serve customers like Business Insider, Opendoor, and Grab.

Open-source, light-weight data shipper with out of the box and extensible log parsing, on-disk buffering, secure transport and bulk indexing.

Remote log monitoring; log aggregation; real-time reporting; custom alerts; custom dashboards; custom log parsers; user permissions; audit trails; log search and drill-down; custom metrics
Open source - Apache Licence; Log parsing; On-disk buffering; Bulk indexing; Low memory overhead; Elasticsearch integration; Log routing; Container/Docker/Kubernetes integration; Log structure parsing; Log enrichment; Log rotation; Secure and reliable data transfer; Masking sensitive data; Syslog integration; Heroku integration; CloudFoundry integration; Filtering and aggregation; Two-way SSL auth
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
390
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
78
Stacks
40
Stacks
4
Followers
59
Followers
5
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Speed of queries
  • 4
    Blazing fast logs search
  • 1
    Simple usage
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Docker
Docker
Redis
Redis
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
MySQL
MySQL
GitHub
GitHub
Node.js
Node.js
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
JavaScript
JavaScript
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Scalyr, Logagent?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana