StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. LogicMonitor vs Solarwinds

LogicMonitor vs Solarwinds

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Stacks37
Followers90
Votes20
Solarwinds
Solarwinds
Stacks80
Followers119
Votes0

LogicMonitor vs Solarwinds: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LogicMonitor and SolarWinds

LogicMonitor and SolarWinds are two popular network monitoring tools that offer various features and functionalities. Below are the key differences between these two tools:

  1. Monitoring Approach: LogicMonitor is a cloud-based monitoring platform that provides full-stack monitoring by collecting data from various sources such as servers, devices, logs, and cloud services. On the other hand, SolarWinds is an on-premise network monitoring tool that primarily focuses on monitoring network devices and infrastructure components.

  2. Ease of Use: LogicMonitor is known for its user-friendly interface and easy setup process. It provides comprehensive out-of-the-box monitoring templates and dashboards, making it easier for users to start monitoring their infrastructure quickly. SolarWinds, although rich in features, can be more complex to set up and requires more time and effort to configure.

  3. Scalability: LogicMonitor is designed to scale easily and can monitor a large number of devices and infrastructure components. It offers high scalability with its cloud-based architecture, allowing users to add new devices and expand their monitoring capabilities seamlessly. In contrast, SolarWinds has limitations in terms of scalability, especially in single-server deployments, which may require additional hardware or resources for larger environments.

  4. Deployment Options: LogicMonitor primarily operates as a SaaS platform, offering ease of deployment and maintenance to its users. It provides automatic updates and infrastructure management, freeing up resources from the infrastructure management tasks. SolarWinds, on the other hand, is deployed on-premise, giving users more control over their data and infrastructure. However, this also means that users will need to handle updates and maintenance themselves.

  5. Alerting and Notification: LogicMonitor offers flexible and customizable alerting features, allowing users to define thresholds and conditions for triggering alerts. It provides various notification methods, including SMS, email, and integrations with third-party collaboration tools like Slack. SolarWinds also offers robust alerting capabilities but may require additional configurations and customization to meet specific requirements.

  6. Cost Model: LogicMonitor follows a subscription-based pricing model, where the cost is determined based on the number of devices being monitored. This allows for more predictable costs and scalability based on the organization's needs. SolarWinds uses a perpetual license model, where users purchase licenses upfront and pay for maintenance and support annually. This can be cost-effective for small environments but may become expensive for larger deployments over time.

In summary, LogicMonitor is a cloud-based monitoring platform with a user-friendly interface and high scalability, offering ease of deployment and flexible alerting capabilities. SolarWinds, an on-premise network monitoring tool, provides more control over data and infrastructure but requires more effort to set up and maintain, with limitations in scalability for larger environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Solarwinds
Solarwinds

LogicMonitor provides the end-to-end visibility needed to maintain the performance and availability of business applications. It leverages automation and built-in intelligence to monitor today's complex and distributed infrastructures.

Developed by network and systems engineers who know what it takes to manage today's dynamic IT environments, SolarWinds has a deep connection to the IT community.

Full Stack Performance Monitoring;Pre-configured monitoring, with built-in alert thresholds, for 1000+ technologies;Works with any Deployment Model: On-prem, Hybrid, & Hybrid Cloud;Granular Monitoring for AWS;Network Scan & Automated Device Discovery;Alert Routing & Escalation;Alert & Performance Forecasting;Custom Dashboards;Custom Reports;REST API;Syslog, Event, & Batch Job Monitoring;External Website Monitoring;Out-of-the-box Integrations for many Communication & Ticketing Tools;Data Stored for up to 2 years Without Aggregation;Remote Sessions;Configuration Management;Automatic Data Backup & Disaster Recovery;Unlimited Users & Granular RBAC;Ongoing Support & Training;SSO & 2FA
-
Statistics
Stacks
37
Stacks
80
Followers
90
Followers
119
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Fast deployment
  • 5
    Auto discovery
  • 3
    Very extensible
  • 3
    Agentless
  • 3
    Awesome support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
RightScale
RightScale
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Twilio
Twilio
HipChat
HipChat
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LogicMonitor, Solarwinds?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana