Logstash vs sqs-s3-logger

Overview

Logstash

Stacks12.3K

Followers8.8K

Votes103

GitHub Stars14.7K

Forks3.5K

sqs-s3-logger

Stacks0

Followers8

Votes0

GitHub Stars178

Forks8

Logstash vs sqs-s3-logger: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Logstash and sqs-s3-logger

Logstash and sqs-s3-logger are both tools used for logging and data processing, but there are key differences that sets them apart.

1. **Input sources**: Logstash supports a wide range of input sources such as files, databases, HTTP, and messaging systems, while sqs-s3-logger is specific to consuming messages from AWS SQS and writing to S3.
   
2. **Plugins and Extensibility**: Logstash has a vast collection of community-contributed plugins for various integrations, transformations, and outputs, whereas sqs-s3-logger has limited flexibility due to its specialized focus on AWS services.

3. **Data Transformation**: Logstash provides powerful filter capabilities for parsing, transforming, and enriching data before sending it to an output, whereas sqs-s3-logger has more limited transformation capabilities since it is mainly focused on sending messages from SQS to S3.

4. **Scalability and Performance**: Logstash is designed to handle large amounts of data with built-in mechanisms for scalability and horizontal scaling, while sqs-s3-logger may have limited scalability options and performance compared to a more general-purpose tool like Logstash.

5. **Community Support**: Logstash has a large and active community with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available for troubleshooting and development, whereas sqs-s3-logger may have a smaller and more specialized community due to its narrower focus on AWS SQS and S3.

6. **Cost implications**: Logstash can be deployed on self-managed infrastructure or as a cloud service, with pricing options based on usage and features, while sqs-s3-logger is more tightly integrated with AWS services, potentially leading to cost considerations based on AWS infrastructure usage.

In Summary, Logstash and sqs-s3-logger have differences in input sources, extensibility, data transformation capabilities, scalability and performance, community support, and cost implications, making each tool suitable for specific use cases based on these factors.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Logstash	sqs-s3-logger
Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.	A library to persist messages on S3 using serverless architecture. It is mainly targeted at cheaply archiving low-volume, sporadic events from applications without a need to spin additional infrastructure.
Centralize data processing of all types;Normalize varying schema and formats;Quickly extend to custom log formats;Easily add plugins for custom data source	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 14.7K	GitHub Stars 178
GitHub Forks 3.5K	GitHub Forks 8
Stacks 12.3K	Stacks 0
Followers 8.8K	Followers 8
Votes 103	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 69 Free 18 Easy but powerful filtering 12 Scalable 2 Kibana provides machine learning based analytics to log 1 Well Documented Cons 4 Memory-intensive 1 Documentation difficult to use	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kibana Elasticsearch Beats	Amazon SQS Amazon S3 AWS Lambda

What are some alternatives to Logstash, sqs-s3-logger?

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Related Comparisons

Logstash vs sqs-s3-logger: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Logstash and sqs-s3-logger

Logstash and sqs-s3-logger are both tools used for logging and data processing, but there are key differences that sets them apart.

1. **Input sources**: Logstash supports a wide range of input sources such as files, databases, HTTP, and messaging systems, while sqs-s3-logger is specific to consuming messages from AWS SQS and writing to S3.
   
2. **Plugins and Extensibility**: Logstash has a vast collection of community-contributed plugins for various integrations, transformations, and outputs, whereas sqs-s3-logger has limited flexibility due to its specialized focus on AWS services.

3. **Data Transformation**: Logstash provides powerful filter capabilities for parsing, transforming, and enriching data before sending it to an output, whereas sqs-s3-logger has more limited transformation capabilities since it is mainly focused on sending messages from SQS to S3.

4. **Scalability and Performance**: Logstash is designed to handle large amounts of data with built-in mechanisms for scalability and horizontal scaling, while sqs-s3-logger may have limited scalability options and performance compared to a more general-purpose tool like Logstash.

5. **Community Support**: Logstash has a large and active community with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available for troubleshooting and development, whereas sqs-s3-logger may have a smaller and more specialized community due to its narrower focus on AWS SQS and S3.

6. **Cost implications**: Logstash can be deployed on self-managed infrastructure or as a cloud service, with pricing options based on usage and features, while sqs-s3-logger is more tightly integrated with AWS services, potentially leading to cost considerations based on AWS infrastructure usage.

Logstash vs sqs-s3-logger

Overview