Overview

LoopBack

Stacks289

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

Next.js

Stacks7.2K

Followers5.1K

Votes328

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

LoopBack vs Next.js: What are the differences?

1. Language: LoopBack is a highly extensible Node.js framework that allows you to create RESTful APIs with minimum code, while Next.js is a React framework that enables server-side rendering for React applications. LoopBack is primarily written in JavaScript, while Next.js is written in TypeScript.
2. Focus: LoopBack is mainly used for building APIs and microservices, providing features such as data modeling, real-time communication, and security. In contrast, Next.js is focused on building reactive and dynamic web applications with server-side rendering capabilities.
3. Server-side Rendering: Next.js offers built-in server-side rendering capabilities, allowing pages to be pre-rendered on the server before being sent to the client. This enhances performance and search engine optimization, as the initial rendering is done by the server. LoopBack, on the other hand, does not have built-in server-side rendering capabilities and is primarily used for creating APIs.
4. Framework Scalability: LoopBack provides a highly scalable and extensible framework for building APIs and microservices. With built-in support for routing, middleware, and authentication, it simplifies the development process. Next.js, on the other hand, focuses on building reactive web applications and excels in providing a seamless development experience for building complex UIs.
5. Community and Support: LoopBack has a strong community and active support, with regular updates and documentation. Next.js also has a vibrant community and active support, backed by the official Next.js team. Both frameworks have dedicated forums, GitHub repositories, and community resources.
6. Learning Curve: LoopBack has a moderate learning curve, as it requires understanding of JavaScript and concepts related to APIs and microservices. Next.js, being a React framework, requires knowledge of JavaScript and React. The learning curve for Next.js may be slightly steeper due to the additional concepts of server-side rendering and routing.

In Summary, LoopBack and Next.js are different in terms of their focus on API development and web application rendering. While LoopBack is primarily used for building APIs and microservices, Next.js is focused on building reactive and dynamic web applications with server-side rendering capabilities.

Advice on LoopBack, Next.js

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack	Next.js
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 289	Stacks 7.2K
Followers 556	Followers 5.1K
Votes 33	Votes 328
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL	React

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.