StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Sauce Labs vs mabl

Sauce Labs vs mabl

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439
mabl
mabl
Stacks28
Followers55
Votes0

Sauce Labs vs mabl: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of software testing, two popular tools stand out - Sauce Labs and mabl. Both tools serve the purpose of providing efficient testing solutions for various applications. However, there are key differences between the two that can help businesses make an informed decision on which tool to choose.

  1. Deployment Options: Sauce Labs offers a cloud-based solution for running tests on various browsers and devices, providing scalability and flexibility. On the other hand, mabl offers a SaaS platform that includes cloud-based deployment but also allows for on-premises deployment, giving users more control over their testing environments.

  2. AI and ML Capabilities: mabl boasts advanced AI and machine learning capabilities, allowing it to automatically adapt tests as applications change over time. In comparison, Sauce Labs primarily focuses on providing a robust testing infrastructure, but with less emphasis on AI and ML in test automation.

  3. Reporting and Metrics: Sauce Labs offers detailed reporting and insight into test results, performance metrics, and device/browser coverage. In contrast, mabl provides detailed visualizations and anomaly detection, making it easier for users to identify and address issues in their test results.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Sauce Labs offers a wide range of integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub, and Bitbucket, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. While mabl also offers integrations with various tools, its focus lies more on providing a comprehensive end-to-end testing solution within its platform.

  5. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Sauce Labs may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and configurations, making it more suitable for experienced QA professionals. On the other hand, mabl prides itself on its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use features, making it a great choice for teams looking to quickly adopt a new testing tool.

  6. Cost and Pricing Structure: Sauce Labs follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of tests run. In contrast, mabl offers a subscription-based pricing model with a focus on the number of test executions, providing more predictability in costs for users.

In Summary, the key differences between Sauce Labs and mabl lie in deployment options, AI and ML capabilities, reporting features, integration ecosystem, ease of use, and pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, mabl

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
mabl
mabl

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Fast easy setup; Machine driven regression testing; Auto-healing tests; Fully managed; Secure; Visual Inspection
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
28
Followers
435
Followers
55
Votes
439
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
No community feedback yet
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
Jira
Jira
Bamboo
Bamboo
GitLab
GitLab
Codeship
Codeship
Postman
Postman
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Segment
Segment

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, mabl?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana