Selenium vs mabl

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

mabl

Stacks28

Followers55

Votes0

Selenium vs mabl: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Selenium and mabl, two popular testing frameworks for web applications.

WebDriver-based vs AI-driven Testing: Selenium is a WebDriver-based testing framework that requires manual script creation and maintenance. On the other hand, mabl is an AI-driven testing platform that uses machine learning to create and maintain tests automatically, reducing the need for manual intervention.
Cross-browser and Cross-platform Compatibility: Selenium supports testing across different web browsers and operating systems, ensuring cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility. Meanwhile, mabl provides built-in cross-browser and cross-platform testing capabilities, enabling seamless testing across various environments without extra configuration or setup.
Test Script Creation: Selenium requires manual test script creation using programming languages such as Java, C#, or Python. Testers need to have programming skills to create and maintain the test scripts. In contrast, mabl provides a no-code interface where testers can create tests using a visual interface without writing any code, making it more accessible for non-technical users.
Test Automation Maintenance: Selenium requires regular test script maintenance to keep up with changes in the application and the testing environment. Test scripts need to be updated manually to accommodate any changes in the application's UI or functionality. In mabl, test maintenance is automated as the platform adapts to changes in the application automatically, reducing the effort required for maintenance.
Testing Speed and Efficiency: Selenium executes tests sequentially, which can be time-consuming for large test suites. On the other hand, mabl leverages parallelization to run tests concurrently, significantly reducing the overall testing time and improving efficiency. This parallel execution capability enhances speed and scalability in mabl.
Integrations and Ecosystem: Selenium has a vast ecosystem with support for various testing frameworks, plugins, and integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, etc. Mabl also provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools, but its ecosystem may be comparatively smaller than Selenium. However, mabl offers dedicated integration with tools like Slack and JIRA for seamless collaboration and bug tracking within the testing workflow.

In summary, Selenium requires manual scripting and maintenance, relies on programming skills, and offers a broader ecosystem, while mabl leverages AI for automation, provides a no-code interface, and excels in automated maintenance and parallel execution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, mabl

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	mabl
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.
-	Fast easy setup; Machine driven regression testing; Auto-healing tests; Fully managed; Secure; Visual Inspection
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 28
Followers 12.6K	Followers 55
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jira Bamboo GitLab Codeship Postman Travis CI Jenkins GitHub Slack Segment

What are some alternatives to Selenium, mabl?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Selenium vs mabl: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Selenium and mabl, two popular testing frameworks for web applications.

WebDriver-based vs AI-driven Testing: Selenium is a WebDriver-based testing framework that requires manual script creation and maintenance. On the other hand, mabl is an AI-driven testing platform that uses machine learning to create and maintain tests automatically, reducing the need for manual intervention.
Cross-browser and Cross-platform Compatibility: Selenium supports testing across different web browsers and operating systems, ensuring cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility. Meanwhile, mabl provides built-in cross-browser and cross-platform testing capabilities, enabling seamless testing across various environments without extra configuration or setup.
Test Script Creation: Selenium requires manual test script creation using programming languages such as Java, C#, or Python. Testers need to have programming skills to create and maintain the test scripts. In contrast, mabl provides a no-code interface where testers can create tests using a visual interface without writing any code, making it more accessible for non-technical users.
Test Automation Maintenance: Selenium requires regular test script maintenance to keep up with changes in the application and the testing environment. Test scripts need to be updated manually to accommodate any changes in the application's UI or functionality. In mabl, test maintenance is automated as the platform adapts to changes in the application automatically, reducing the effort required for maintenance.
Testing Speed and Efficiency: Selenium executes tests sequentially, which can be time-consuming for large test suites. On the other hand, mabl leverages parallelization to run tests concurrently, significantly reducing the overall testing time and improving efficiency. This parallel execution capability enhances speed and scalability in mabl.
Integrations and Ecosystem: Selenium has a vast ecosystem with support for various testing frameworks, plugins, and integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, etc. Mabl also provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools, but its ecosystem may be comparatively smaller than Selenium. However, mabl offers dedicated integration with tools like Slack and JIRA for seamless collaboration and bug tracking within the testing workflow.

Selenium vs mabl

Overview

Selenium vs mabl: What are the differences?