Magnum CI vs Rancher: What are the differences?
Developers describe Magnum CI as "Hosted Continuous Integration and Delivery Platform for private repositories". Magnum CI is a hosted continuous integration service for private projects. It supports multiple languages and tools to run test suite Service supports all major version control software and integrates with most popular code hosting platforms. There are no restrictions or limitations on where you store your source code, so even your own self-hosted repository will work right away.. On the other hand, Rancher is detailed as "Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service". Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
Magnum CI and Rancher are primarily classified as "Continuous Integration" and "Container" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Magnum CI are:
- Easy Integration
- Flexible Builds
- Code Metrics
On the other hand, Rancher provides the following key features:
- Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources
- User Management & Collaboration
- Native Docker APIs & Tools
"Free" is the primary reason why developers consider Magnum CI over the competitors, whereas "Easy to use" was stated as the key factor in picking Rancher.
Rancher is an open source tool with 11.8K GitHub stars and 1.31K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Rancher's open source repository on GitHub.
What is Magnum CI?
What is Rancher?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Magnum CI?
What companies use Magnum CI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
- Consume too much unnecessary resource by just running rancher agent alone;
- Hard to recover from system failure
- Bad performance of load balancing (compare to dokcer swarm built-in LB or others).
The whole infrastructure is managed through Rancher. It provides a simple interface to all the underlying tools - Docker, HAProxy (automatically configures load balancer from the containers).
Currently looking to move to Swarm or Kubernetes due to a few issues I have with Rancher.
We use Rancher for container orchestration and automated deployment pipelines.