StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Dependency Monitoring
  5. McAfee Endpoint Protection vs WhiteSource

McAfee Endpoint Protection vs WhiteSource

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WhiteSource
WhiteSource
Stacks25
Followers67
Votes0
McAfee Endpoint Protection
McAfee Endpoint Protection
Stacks38
Followers14
Votes0

McAfee Endpoint Protection vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When considering cybersecurity solutions, it is crucial to understand the key differences between McAfee Endpoint Protection and WhiteSource. Both offer distinctive features and focus areas that cater to varying security needs.

1. **Integration with Development Lifecycle**: McAfee Endpoint Protection primarily focuses on endpoint security, offering features such as antivirus, firewall, and threat detection. On the other hand, WhiteSource specializes in open-source security and license compliance, integrating seamlessly into the development lifecycle to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in open-source components before deployment.
   
2. **Scalability**: McAfee Endpoint Protection is well-suited for medium to large enterprises with a centralized management system. In contrast, WhiteSource is more tailored towards software development companies, providing scalability to handle continuous integration/development environments and DevOps processes efficiently.

3. **Focus on Open-Source Security**: While McAfee Endpoint Protection covers a broad spectrum of security threats, WhiteSource uniquely focuses on open-source security risks, offering in-depth vulnerability analysis, patching guidance, and license compliance checks specifically for open-source components used in software development.

4. **Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics**: McAfee Endpoint Protection emphasizes real-time monitoring and reporting on endpoint devices, ensuring immediate threat response and incident management. Conversely, WhiteSource emphasizes detailed analytics and reporting on open-source components within the software supply chain, enabling proactive vulnerability management and compliance enforcement.

5. **Automated Remediation Capabilities**: WhiteSource stands out with its automated remediation capabilities, facilitating the quick and efficient fixing of vulnerabilities in open-source components through suggested patches or updates. In contrast, McAfee Endpoint Protection focuses more on threat detection and prevention rather than automated remediation.

6. **Cost Structure and Licensing Models**: McAfee Endpoint Protection typically follows a subscription-based pricing model for endpoint protection services, while WhiteSource offers flexible pricing based on the number of developers and the scale of code repositories under monitoring, making it more adaptable to varying organizational needs.

## In Summary, 
Understanding the differences between McAfee Endpoint Protection and WhiteSource is essential to choosing the right cybersecurity solution that aligns with specific security requirements and organizational priorities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WhiteSource, McAfee Endpoint Protection

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WhiteSource
WhiteSource
McAfee Endpoint Protection
McAfee Endpoint Protection

The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.

It provides essential security for many types of endpoints, from smart phones to printers. An endpoint protection platform (EPP) is an integrated suite of endpoint protection technologies—such as antivirus, data encryption, intrusion prevention, and data loss prevention—that detects and stops a variety of threats at the endpoint.

Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;
Antivirus; Data encryption, Intrusion prevention, Data loss prevention
Statistics
Stacks
25
Stacks
38
Followers
67
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Docker
Docker
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
.NET Core
.NET Core
CocoaPods
CocoaPods
npm
npm
TeamCity
TeamCity
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WhiteSource, McAfee Endpoint Protection?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Snyk

Snyk

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

FOSSA

FOSSA

Stop vulnerabilities, automate compliance, and mitigate third-party risk in your applications

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp