StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Caching
  4. Managed Memcache
  5. MemCachier vs Memcached Cloud

MemCachier vs Memcached Cloud

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MemCachier
MemCachier
Stacks96
Followers87
Votes39
Memcached Cloud
Memcached Cloud
Stacks12
Followers16
Votes24

MemCachier vs Memcached Cloud: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides the key differences between MemCachier and Memcached Cloud, two popular caching solutions. These differences are outlined below in six specific paragraphs, highlighting the key distinctions between the two services.

  1. Pricing Model: MemCachier offers a pricing model based on usage, where customers pay for the quantity of cache consumed and the level of support required. On the other hand, Memcached Cloud employs a tiered pricing structure, providing different plans with fixed cache sizes and different support options.

  2. Managed Service: MemCachier is a fully managed caching service, which means that the infrastructure and maintenance tasks are taken care of by the provider. This relieves the user from the burden of managing the caching system, ensuring high availability and reliability. In contrast, Memcached Cloud is also a managed service, but it requires some level of configuration and setup by the user, such as creating and configuring cache clusters.

  3. Supported Environments: MemCachier is compatible with various popular hosting providers, including Heroku, AWS, and Google Cloud Platform. It seamlessly integrates into these environments, making it easy to incorporate caching into existing applications. On the other hand, Memcached Cloud supports a wider range of hosting environments, including traditional data centers, cloud platforms, and hybrid setups, offering more flexibility in terms of deployment options.

  4. Scaling Options: MemCachier allows users to scale their cache capacity vertically by increasing the size of their cache instances. This provides a simple way to accommodate increased usage and demand. In contrast, Memcached Cloud supports both vertical and horizontal scaling. In addition to increasing cache size, it also allows users to add more cache nodes to distribute the load and improve performance further.

  5. Additional Features: MemCachier provides additional features like analytics and monitoring capabilities to help users gain insights into cache performance and usage patterns. These features enable better cache management and optimization. Memcached Cloud, on the other hand, focuses more on the core caching functionality and does not offer the same level of advanced analytics and monitoring features.

  6. Integration with Ecosystem: MemCachier seamlessly integrates with various data stores and frameworks, including popular options like MySQL and PostgreSQL, as well as languages like Ruby, Python, and Java. This wide integration support makes it convenient for developers working with different technologies. In comparison, Memcached Cloud also provides integration with various data stores and frameworks, but the range of supported technologies may be more limited compared to MemCachier.

In summary, MemCachier and Memcached Cloud differ in their pricing models, level of management required, supported environments, scaling options, additional features, and integration capabilities. These distinctions make it essential for users to evaluate their specific requirements and choose the caching solution that aligns best with their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MemCachier
MemCachier
Memcached Cloud
Memcached Cloud

MemCachier provides an easy and powerful managed caching solution for all your performance and scalability needs. It works with the ubiquitous memcache protocol so your favourite language and framework already supports it.

Memcached Cloud is a fully-managed service for running your Memcached in a reliable and fail-safe manner. Your dataset is constantly replicated, so if a node fails, an auto-switchover mechanism guarantees data is served without interruption. Memcached Cloud provides various data persistence options as well as remote backups for disaster recovery purposes.

High-availability; Seamless scalability; Multiple proxy servers; SSL authentication and encryption; High reliability and fault tolerance; 24/7 monitoring; Expert support
true high-availability;fast storage engine;backups and imports;infinite seamless scalability;predictable high-performance;multiple buckets in a plan;ssl authentication & encryption;email alerts;fully-automated service;24/7 monitoring & support
Statistics
Stacks
96
Stacks
12
Followers
87
Followers
16
Votes
39
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Easy add-on to heroku
  • 14
    Simple
  • 3
    High reliability
  • 2
    Has a New Relic plugin
  • 1
    Free tier is enough for small apps
Pros
  • 6
    Heroku add-on
  • 6
    High-availability
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Email alerts
  • 2
    Fail-safe
Integrations
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
dotCloud
dotCloud
CloudBees
CloudBees
cloudControl
cloudControl
Heroku
Heroku
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
AppFog
AppFog
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Redis
Redis
Heroku
Heroku
Memcached
Memcached

What are some alternatives to MemCachier, Memcached Cloud?

Amazon ElastiCache

Amazon ElastiCache

ElastiCache improves the performance of web applications by allowing you to retrieve information from fast, managed, in-memory caches, instead of relying entirely on slower disk-based databases. ElastiCache supports Memcached and Redis.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase