StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Memcached vs PostgreSQL

Memcached vs PostgreSQL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Stacks103.0K
Followers83.9K
Votes3.6K
GitHub Stars19.0K
Forks5.2K
Memcached
Memcached
Stacks7.9K
Followers5.7K
Votes473
GitHub Stars14.0K
Forks3.3K

Memcached vs PostgreSQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Memcached and PostgreSQL, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two popular data storage solutions.

  1. Data Structure : Memcached is a key-value store where data is stored in a simple schemaless manner, making it ideal for caching frequently accessed data. In contrast, PostgreSQL is a relational database management system that organizes data in tables with defined structures, supporting complex queries and relationships between different datasets.

  2. Consistency vs. Speed : Memcached prioritizes speed by quickly fetching stored data, but it sacrifices consistency as it does not guarantee data persistence in case of server failure. On the other hand, PostgreSQL ensures data consistency through ACID compliance, offering durable transactions that maintain data integrity even in the event of system crashes.

  3. Data Storage : Memcached stores data in-memory, which provides fast read and write operations but limits the amount of data that can be cached based on available memory. PostgreSQL, in contrast, stores data on disk, allowing for larger datasets to be managed efficiently with support for indexes and query optimization.

  4. Query Capabilities : Memcached lacks advanced query capabilities and supports only basic operations like get, set, and delete for retrieving and modifying data based on keys. PostgreSQL offers a robust set of SQL features for complex queries, joins, aggregations, and subqueries, enabling users to manipulate data in various ways to extract meaningful insights.

  5. Data Persistence : Memcached does not inherently support data persistence to disk, relying on the cache to hold frequently accessed data in memory for faster retrieval. PostgreSQL, on the other hand, provides mechanisms for durable data storage on disk, ensuring that data remains intact even after system restarts or failures.

  6. Scalability : Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more cache servers to distribute the load and accommodate increased traffic efficiently. PostgreSQL supports vertical scaling by upgrading hardware resources, but horizontal scaling requires more complex setups like sharding or replication to handle larger datasets and higher query loads.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Memcached and PostgreSQL is crucial for selecting the appropriate data storage solution based on the specific requirements of an application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PostgreSQL, Memcached

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Fortinet

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

MySQL has a lot of strengths working for it. It's simple and easy to set up and use. It's JSON engine is also really good these days. Mongo is also simple to setup and use, and it's speed as a document-object storage engine is first class.

Where Postgres has both beat is in it's combining of all of the features that make both MySQL and Mongo great, while adding on enterprise grade level scalability and replication. It's Postgres' stability and robustness, while still fulfilling the roles of it's contemporaries extremely well that edge Postgre for me.

1.03M views1.03M
Comments
Navraj
Navraj

CEO at SuPragma

Apr 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I asked my last question incorrectly. Rephrasing it here.

I am looking for the most secure open source database for my project I'm starting: https://github.com/SuPragma/SuPragma/wiki

Which database is more secure? MySQL or PostgreSQL? Are there others I should be considering? Is it possible to change the encryption keys dynamically?

Thanks,

Raj

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Memcached
Memcached

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.0K
GitHub Stars
14.0K
GitHub Forks
5.2K
GitHub Forks
3.3K
Stacks
103.0K
Stacks
7.9K
Followers
83.9K
Followers
5.7K
Votes
3.6K
Votes
473
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 765
    Relational database
  • 511
    High availability
  • 439
    Enterprise class database
  • 383
    Sql
  • 304
    Sql + nosql
Cons
  • 10
    Table/index bloatings
Pros
  • 139
    Fast object cache
  • 129
    High-performance
  • 91
    Stable
  • 65
    Mature
  • 33
    Distributed caching system
Cons
  • 2
    Only caches simple types

What are some alternatives to PostgreSQL, Memcached?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

CouchDB

CouchDB

Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase