Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Meteor vs Redux: What are the differences?
Developers describe Meteor as "An ultra-simple, database-everywhere, data-on-the-wire, pure-Javascript web framework". A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets. On the other hand, Redux is detailed as "Predictable state container for JavaScript apps". Redux helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. On top of that, it provides a great developer experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.
Meteor and Redux are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "State Management Library" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Meteor are:
- Pure JavaScript
- Live page updates
- Clean, powerful data synchronization
On the other hand, Redux provides the following key features:
- Predictable state
- Easy testing
- Works with other view layers besides React
"Real-time", "Full stack, one language" and "Best app dev platform available today" are the key factors why developers consider Meteor; whereas "State is predictable", "Plays well with React and others" and "State stored in a single object tree" are the primary reasons why Redux is favored.
Meteor and Redux are both open source tools. It seems that Redux with 49.5K GitHub stars and 12.8K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Meteor with 41.2K GitHub stars and 5.03K GitHub forks.
Instagram, Intuit, and OpenGov are some of the popular companies that use Redux, whereas Meteor is used by Accenture, Rocket.Chat, and FashionUnited. Redux has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1036 company stacks & 836 developers stacks; compared to Meteor, which is listed in 195 company stacks and 157 developer stacks.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...
Pros of Meteor
- Real-time251
- Full stack, one language200
- Best app dev platform available today183
- Data synchronization155
- Javascript152
- Focus on your product not the plumbing118
- Hot code pushes107
- Open source106
- Live page updates102
- Latency compensation92
- Ultra-simple development environment39
- Smart Packages29
- Real time awesome29
- Great for beginners23
- Direct Cordova integration22
- Better than Rails16
- Less moving parts15
- It's just amazing13
- Blaze10
- Great community support8
- Plugins for everything8
- One command spits out android and ios ready apps.6
- It just works5
- 0 to Production in no time5
- Coding Speed4
- Easy deployment4
- Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)4
- You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense4
- Easy yet powerful2
- AngularJS Integration2
- One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS2
- Community2
- Easy Setup1
- Free1
- Nosql1
- Hookie friendly1
- High quality, very few bugs1
- Stack available on Codeanywhere1
- Real time1
- Friendly to use1
Pros of Redux
- State is predictable191
- Plays well with React and others150
- State stored in a single object tree126
- Hot reloading out of the box79
- Allows for time travel74
- You can log everything14
- Great tutorial direct from the creator12
- Endorsed by the creator of Flux7
- Test without browser7
- Easy to debug6
- Enforces one-way data flow3
- Granular updates3
- Blabla2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Meteor
- Does not scale well5
- Hard to debug issues on the server-side4
- Heavily CPU bound4
Cons of Redux
- Lots of boilerplate13
- Verbose6
- Steep learning curve5
- Design5
- Steeper learning curve than RxJs4
- Steeper learning curve than MobX4
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Meteor?
What is Redux?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Meteor?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Redux?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+8
+17
+29
+42+47+46
+43