Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft Teams vs Zulip: What are the differences?
Introduction: Microsoft Teams and Zulip are both popular project management and communication tools used by teams and organizations worldwide. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.
Interface and Organization: Microsoft Teams provides a more traditional chat-based interface where conversations are organized into channels, making it easy to follow discussions and collaborate with team members. On the other hand, Zulip offers a unique threaded conversation model, organizing discussions into topics and subtopics, which allows for better context and reduces noise in large teams.
Integration with External Tools: Microsoft Teams offers seamless integration with other Microsoft applications such as Office 365, SharePoint, and Outlook. This enables users to access files, calendar appointments, and emails all within the Teams platform. In contrast, Zulip provides a wide range of integrations with popular third-party applications like GitHub, JIRA, and Trello, allowing teams to centralize their workflows and access various tools from a single workspace.
Message Visibility and Notifications: In Microsoft Teams, by default, all messages sent to a channel are visible to all members, and users receive notifications for every message, resulting in a constant stream of communication. However, Zulip allows users to choose the level of visibility for their messages, making it possible to have private conversations within public topics. Users can also control their level of notification, reducing interruptions and improving focus.
Topic-Based Streams: While both platforms allow users to create channels or streams for discussions, the difference lies in how these channels are organized. Microsoft Teams primarily uses channels based on projects, departments, or topics. In contrast, Zulip has topic-based streams, making it easier to participate in multiple conversations on various topics simultaneously. This helps teams with diverse interests and responsibilities collaborate more effectively.
Search and Filtering Capabilities: Microsoft Teams provides a basic search functionality, allowing users to search for messages, files, and people within the platform. However, Zulip offers advanced search and filtering capabilities, allowing users to search through messages, files, and topics with specific criteria such as sender, time range, and stream. This helps users locate information quickly and efficiently.
Open Source and Customization: Zulip is an open-source platform that allows users to customize and extend its functionality according to their specific requirements. This makes it highly customizable, providing flexibility for organizations with unique needs. In comparison, Microsoft Teams does not offer the same level of customization or open-source capabilities.
In Summary, Microsoft Teams provides a channel-based interface with seamless integration to Microsoft applications, while Zulip offers a topic-based threaded conversation model, advanced search capabilities, an open-source platform, and a wide range of integrations with popular third-party tools.
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
we were using slack
and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow29
- Mobile friendly24
- Free19
- Well-thought Design12
- Great integrations12
- Channels10
- Easy setup9
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Easy to integrate with5
- Multi domain switching support4
- Web interface4
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Great voice quality2
Pros of Zulip
- Open source65
- Great Community48
- Extensive developer documentation40
- Powered by Python38
- Clean & Smooth UI34
- Full text search26
- Dozens of integrations25
- Threading model25
- On-premise deployment21
- Fully internationalized16
- Cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android)12
- Its very good forsearching and chatting with topics5
- Awesome open source alternative to Slack3
- Runs very well3
- Very Nice2
- Mobile Push Notification1
- LDAP Integration1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1
Cons of Zulip
- Integration with most of well known services1
- The interface require a lot of overhaul0