Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
NetBeans IDE vs Terraform: What are the differences?
# Key Differences between NetBeans IDE and Terraform
NetBeans IDE is an integrated development environment primarily used for Java development, offering features like code editing, compiling, debugging, and profiling tools. Terraform, on the other hand, is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool used for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure efficiently.
1. **Language Support**: NetBeans IDE supports multiple programming languages like Java, C, C++, HTML, and more, whereas Terraform focuses on defining infrastructure configurations using its own domain-specific language (HCL).
2. **Purpose**: NetBeans IDE focuses on software development tasks such as coding, compiling, and debugging, while Terraform is designed specifically for infrastructure automation and management.
3. **SDK Integration**: NetBeans IDE provides seamless integration with various software development kits (SDKs) for different programming languages, while Terraform integrates with cloud provider APIs and services to manage infrastructure environments.
4. **Version Control**: NetBeans IDE has built-in support for popular version control systems like Git, SVN, and Mercurial, enabling collaborative software development, whereas Terraform supports versioning infrastructure configurations using its own version control system.
5. **Community Support**: NetBeans IDE has a large community of developers, offering plugins, extensions, and support forums for troubleshooting and assistance, while Terraform has a dedicated community focused on infrastructure automation and best practices.
6. **Deployment Automation**: NetBeans IDE does not have built-in tools for infrastructure deployment automation, whereas Terraform excels in automating the provisioning and deployment of infrastructure resources.
In Summary, NetBeans IDE is an integrated development environment for software development in various languages, while Terraform is an infrastructure as code tool for managing and automating infrastructure configurations.
Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.
We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.
Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.
AdvantagesTerraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.
Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.
Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.
DisadvantagesSoftware is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.
Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.
Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.
I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:
- I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
- I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
- I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.
I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:
- It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
- It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
- It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
- It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.
Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!
Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME
Check out the GitHub repo attached
Pros of NetBeans IDE
- Rich features76
- Crossplatform69
- Plugins(Git, SVN)49
- Easy to use38
- Extensible38
- PHP Support35
- Java support34
- File History28
- Code analysis21
- MySQL support18
- Free14
- Open source14
- Code completion10
- Strong Maven Support9
- NodeJs support8
- Webdev king6
- Easy maven project start6
- Best6
- Jira Plugin4
- Foss4
- Out of the box integration with maven, git, svn3
- History of changes, friendly tabs3
- Mandatory3
- Intuitive ui2
- Chrome plugin to live update javascript from browser2
- Groovy support2
- Native Nette support2
- I don't like NetBeans2
- Smarty support2
- Visual GUI Builder for Swing / AWT2
- Custom html tags support2
- Powerful refactoring1
- Composer commands inside IDE1
Pros of Terraform
- Infrastructure as code121
- Declarative syntax73
- Planning45
- Simple28
- Parallelism24
- Well-documented8
- Cloud agnostic8
- It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English6
- Immutable infrastructure6
- Platform agnostic5
- Extendable4
- Automation4
- Automates infrastructure deployments4
- Portability4
- Lightweight2
- Scales to hundreds of hosts2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NetBeans IDE
- PHP debug doesn't support conditional breakpoints2
Cons of Terraform
- Doesn't have full support to GKE1