StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Netflix OSS vs Pact

Netflix OSS vs Pact

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netflix OSS
Netflix OSS
Stacks76
Followers145
Votes0
Pact
Pact
Stacks59
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars221
Forks90

Netflix OSS vs Pact: What are the differences?

Developers describe Netflix OSS as "A set of frameworks and libraries to solve distributed-systems problems at scale". It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices. On the other hand, Pact is detailed as "Fast, easy and reliable testing for your APIs and microservices during development". It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.

Netflix OSS and Pact are primarily classified as "Container" and "Microservices" tools respectively.

Pact is an open source tool with 196 GitHub stars and 93 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Pact's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netflix OSS
Netflix OSS
Pact
Pact

It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.

It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.

-
Support for JavaScript, JVM, .NET, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Swift and more; Get fast, reliable feedback on the compatibility of your integrations; Ensures all your services are compatible with each other before you deploy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
221
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
90
Stacks
76
Stacks
59
Followers
145
Followers
79
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Netflix OSS, Pact?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana