Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs React Storybook: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Next.js and React Storybook are both powerful tools used in web development, but they serve different purposes. Next.js is a framework for building server-side rendered and static websites with React, while React Storybook is a tool for developing and testing isolated React components. Here are the key differences between Next.js and React Storybook:
1. Routing and Page Rendering: Next.js provides built-in routing capabilities, allowing developers to easily create and manage multiple pages with client-side navigation. It handles server-side rendering by default, which improves performance and provides better SEO. On the other hand, React Storybook focuses solely on component development and does not offer built-in routing or server-side rendering.
2. Live Development Server: Next.js comes with a built-in development server that automatically refreshes the browser when changes are made to the code. This speeds up the development process and allows for instant feedback. React Storybook also provides a live development server, but its main focus is on isolating and testing individual components rather than the entire application.
3. Component Isolation and Testing: React Storybook excels at isolating components, allowing developers to develop and test them in isolation from the rest of the application. It provides a sandbox environment where components can be rendered and tested with different props and states. Next.js, on the other hand, is more focused on building complete web applications and does not provide the same level of component isolation and testing capabilities as React Storybook.
4. Documentation and Collaboration: React Storybook provides a platform for documenting and showcasing React components, making it a great tool for collaboration and code sharing. Developers can easily create interactive documentation and share it with other team members or the community. Next.js, while it does provide documentation capabilities, is more geared towards building and deploying complete websites rather than documenting and sharing individual components.
5. Deployment and Production: Next.js is designed to make it easy to deploy and run production-grade websites. It provides features like server-side rendering, static site generation, and automatic code splitting, which improve performance and allow for efficient deployment. React Storybook, on the other hand, is primarily used in development environments and is not intended for production deployment.
6. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support. It has been widely adopted by companies and developers for building production-grade websites. React Storybook also has a growing community and ecosystem, but it is mainly focused on component development and testing, so it may not have the same level of adoption as Next.js.
In summary, Next.js is a framework for building server-side rendered and static websites with built-in routing and server-side rendering capabilities, while React Storybook is a tool for developing and testing isolated React components with a focus on component isolation, development, and testing. Both tools have their unique strengths and use cases, catering to different aspects of web development.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting51
- Built with React44
- Easy setup34
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Just JavaScript12
- Simple deployment12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Pros of React Storybook
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9
Cons of React Storybook
- Hard dependency to Babel loader5