StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Webpack vs nodemon

Webpack vs nodemon

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
nodemon
nodemon
Stacks3.3K
Followers195
Votes2
GitHub Stars26.7K
Forks1.7K

Webpack vs Nodemon: What are the differences?

Webpack and Nodemon are essential tools in the web development ecosystem. Webpack is a module bundler that optimizes and bundles various assets for web applications, while Nodemon is a utility that automatically restarts a Node.js application when changes are detected, aiding in development. Here are the key differences between Webpack and Nodemon:

  1. Purpose and Usage: Webpack is primarily used for bundling and optimizing various assets like JavaScript, CSS, and images, making them ready for deployment. It enables the creation of a dependency graph, code splitting, and generating optimized output bundles. Nodemon, on the other hand, is used during development to monitor changes in Node.js application files and automatically restart the server, ensuring a smoother development workflow.

  2. Workflow Integration: Webpack is integrated into the build process of a web application and is executed when preparing the application for production. It's a one-time process that generates optimized assets. Nodemon, however, is designed for development environments. It runs alongside your Node.js application, monitoring for changes and restarting the server to reflect code modifications without manual restarts.

  3. Development vs Production: Webpack is mainly used in the production build process to create optimized bundles that are efficient for serving to users. It optimizes assets, reduces file sizes, and handles code splitting. Nodemon is used exclusively during development to enhance the developer's experience by automatically restarting the server when code changes occur.

  4. Configuration: Webpack configuration involves specifying entry points, loaders, plugins, and output settings to control how assets are bundled and optimized. Nodemon configuration focuses on specifying which files should be watched and which file extensions should trigger server restarts.

  5. Use Cases: Webpack is crucial for projects that require efficient asset bundling, including modern web applications with complex dependencies. Nodemon is valuable when working on Node.js applications, ensuring that the development server remains up-to-date with code changes without manual intervention.

  6. Dependency: Webpack doesn't have a direct dependency on Node.js; it's mainly used to bundle front-end assets. Nodemon, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Node.js applications and is installed as a development dependency.

In summary, Webpack optimizes and bundles assets for production, while Nodemon enhances the development experience by automatically restarting the server when code changes occur, improving efficiency during the development phase.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, nodemon

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
nodemon
nodemon

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

It is an open source utility that will monitor for any changes in your source and automatically restart your server. It has a default support for node & coffeescript, but easy to run any executable (such as python, make, etc).

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Automatic restarting of application; Detects default file extension to monitor
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
26.7K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
3.3K
Followers
28.1K
Followers
195
Votes
752
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    It's lightweight
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
TypeScript
TypeScript
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Webpack, nodemon?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Nodetime

Nodetime

Nodetime is an application performance management toolset in the cloud - an all-round solution for performance monitoring, optimization and troubleshooting.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana