Snap CI vs npm

Overview

npm

Stacks137.4K

Followers82.2K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars17.6K

Forks3.0K

Snap CI

Stacks29

Followers56

Votes100

Snap CI vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Snap CI and npm are both widely used tools in the software development industry. While they serve different purposes, it is important to understand their key differences to effectively utilize them in a project.

Integration and Deployment Process: Snap CI is a continuous integration and deployment tool that provides a simple and intuitive pipeline for running tests, building and deploying applications. On the other hand, npm is a package manager for Node.js that helps in managing dependencies and allows developers to install, update and uninstall packages easily within their projects.
Supported Languages and Platforms: Snap CI supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms including Java, Ruby, Python, Go, and more. It provides integrations with popular tools and frameworks used in those languages. In contrast, npm is primarily used for managing JavaScript packages and dependencies within Node.js projects.
Workflow Automation: Snap CI offers a powerful workflow automation feature that allows developers to define custom workflows using a simple YAML syntax. It enables complex build and deployment pipelines with conditional statements, parallel steps, and manual approval stages. npm, on the other hand, focuses on package installation, resolution, and version management, and does not provide built-in workflow automation capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: npm has a larger and more diverse user community due to its popularity and extensive usage in the JavaScript development ecosystem. It has a vast repository of open-source packages and a thriving developer community that actively contributes to its growth. Snap CI, being a specialized CI/CD tool, might have a smaller but focused user base with more specialized and specific use cases.
Configuration and Customization: Snap CI provides a web-based interface for configuring and customizing the build and deployment pipelines. It offers flexibility in defining environment variables, secrets, and test configurations through its UI. npm, on the other hand, uses a configuration file called package.json, where developers specify the project's dependencies and various scripts for running different tasks.
Pricing and Licensing: Snap CI offers both free and paid plans based on the usage and number of concurrent builds. It also provides enterprise plans for larger organizations that require additional features and support. npm, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and free to use. However, it does offer enterprise solutions and premium features under its paid plans.

In Summary, Snap CI provides a comprehensive continuous integration and deployment solution with powerful workflow automation, while npm focuses primarily on package management within Node.js projects, and has a larger and more diverse community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on npm, Snap CI

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

Reviewon

React

TypeScript

Yarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm	Snap CI
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.	Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.
-	Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS;System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries;Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.;Multi-Stage Deployment Pipelines
Statistics
GitHub Stars 17.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 137.4K	Stacks 29
Followers 82.2K	Followers 56
Votes 1.6K	Votes 100
Pros & Cons
Pros 648 Best package management system for javascript 382 Open-source 327 Great community 148 More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist 112 Nice people matter Cons 5 Problems with lockfiles 5 Bad at package versioning and being deterministic 3 Node-gyp takes forever 1 Super slow	Pros 14 Github integration 13 Easy setup 11 Multi-stage pipelines 10 Continuous deployment 9 Great customer support
Integrations
No integrations available	Docker Slack Amazon EC2 GitHub Heroku

What are some alternatives to npm, Snap CI?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

Snap CI vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration and Deployment Process: Snap CI is a continuous integration and deployment tool that provides a simple and intuitive pipeline for running tests, building and deploying applications. On the other hand, npm is a package manager for Node.js that helps in managing dependencies and allows developers to install, update and uninstall packages easily within their projects.
Supported Languages and Platforms: Snap CI supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms including Java, Ruby, Python, Go, and more. It provides integrations with popular tools and frameworks used in those languages. In contrast, npm is primarily used for managing JavaScript packages and dependencies within Node.js projects.
Workflow Automation: Snap CI offers a powerful workflow automation feature that allows developers to define custom workflows using a simple YAML syntax. It enables complex build and deployment pipelines with conditional statements, parallel steps, and manual approval stages. npm, on the other hand, focuses on package installation, resolution, and version management, and does not provide built-in workflow automation capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: npm has a larger and more diverse user community due to its popularity and extensive usage in the JavaScript development ecosystem. It has a vast repository of open-source packages and a thriving developer community that actively contributes to its growth. Snap CI, being a specialized CI/CD tool, might have a smaller but focused user base with more specialized and specific use cases.
Configuration and Customization: Snap CI provides a web-based interface for configuring and customizing the build and deployment pipelines. It offers flexibility in defining environment variables, secrets, and test configurations through its UI. npm, on the other hand, uses a configuration file called package.json, where developers specify the project's dependencies and various scripts for running different tasks.
Pricing and Licensing: Snap CI offers both free and paid plans based on the usage and number of concurrent builds. It also provides enterprise plans for larger organizations that require additional features and support. npm, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and free to use. However, it does offer enterprise solutions and premium features under its paid plans.

Snap CI vs npm

Overview