StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. OpenStack vs Vagrant

OpenStack vs Vagrant

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138

OpenStack vs Vagrant: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenStack and Vagrant are both popular open-source tools used for managing infrastructure, but they have key differences in their purpose and functionality.

  1. Deployment Approach: OpenStack is a cloud computing platform that allows users to deploy and manage large-scale virtualized infrastructure. It provides a complete solution for building and managing private, public, and hybrid clouds. On the other hand, Vagrant is a tool for creating and managing lightweight, reproducible, and portable development environments. It focuses on quickly provisioning and configuring virtual machines for development purposes.

  2. Scope and Scalability: OpenStack is designed to handle large-scale infrastructure deployments, with support for thousands of physical servers. It provides extensive networking, compute, and storage capabilities, making it suitable for enterprises and service providers. Vagrant, on the other hand, is intended for smaller-scale deployments, typically used by individual developers or small teams. It excels in providing isolated and consistent development environments.

  3. Orchestration Capabilities: OpenStack includes a powerful orchestration service called Heat, which allows users to define and manage complex infrastructure resources using templates. It provides support for automated scaling, rolling updates, and other advanced deployment scenarios. Vagrant, on the other hand, does not offer built-in orchestration capabilities. It primarily focuses on simplifying the process of building and provisioning virtual machines.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: OpenStack has a large and vibrant community with numerous companies and individuals contributing to its development and maintenance. It has an extensive ecosystem of plugins, tools, and services that further enhance its functionality. Vagrant also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem is relatively smaller in comparison. It provides a range of plugins for integrating with different virtualization and cloud providers.

  5. Integration with Existing Infrastructure: OpenStack is designed to integrate with existing infrastructure components, such as storage systems, networking equipment, and authentication services. It provides APIs and drivers for integrating with a wide range of technologies. Vagrant, on the other hand, focuses on providing a unified interface for managing virtual machines across different providers. While it supports integration with some infrastructure components, it may not have the same level of flexibility as OpenStack in this regard.

  6. Use Cases and Target Audience: OpenStack is commonly used by enterprises and service providers to build and manage large-scale cloud infrastructures. It caters to a wide range of use cases, including traditional IT workloads, big data analytics, and network function virtualization. Vagrant, on the other hand, targets individual developers and small teams who need quick and isolated development environments. It is well-suited for web development, testing, and experimenting with different configurations.

In Summary, OpenStack is a comprehensive cloud computing platform designed for large-scale infrastructure deployments, while Vagrant is a tool for quickly creating and managing development environments. OpenStack focuses on complex orchestration and integration with existing infrastructure, whereas Vagrant prioritizes simplicity and ease of use for individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
OpenStack
OpenStack

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Statistics
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
790
Followers
7.8K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
1.5K
Votes
138
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, OpenStack?

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

XenServer

XenServer

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

OpenNebula

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

VMware ESXi

VMware ESXi

It is a bare metal hypervisor that installs easily on to your server and partitions it into multiple virtual machines. It effectively partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus is open source software for building private, AWS-compatible IT, QA, and developer clouds. It makes it easy to deliver cloud computing, just like AWS, from within your data center.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana