StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Phoenix Framework vs Symfony

Phoenix Framework vs Symfony

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.0K
Votes678
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks3.0K

Phoenix Framework vs Symfony: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Phoenix Framework, built on Elixir, uses a more functional programming approach with a focus on concurrency and scalability, while Symfony, built on PHP, follows a more traditional object-oriented programming model with an emphasis on flexibility and maintainability.
  2. Language: Phoenix Framework utilizes the Elixir language, which is known for its high-performance and fault-tolerant capabilities, whereas Symfony is based on PHP, a widely-used scripting language that powers a large portion of the web.
  3. Performance: Phoenix Framework is designed to handle a high volume of requests efficiently due to its underlying Erlang VM, whereas Symfony might experience performance bottlenecks under heavy loads because of the nature of PHP.
  4. Learning Curve: Phoenix Framework may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with functional programming concepts, whereas Symfony, with its more traditional approach, might be easier for developers already familiar with PHP and object-oriented programming.
  5. Community Support: Symfony, being built on PHP, has a larger community and ecosystem of third-party libraries and plugins available, making it easier to find solutions and resources compared to the relatively newer and smaller community around Phoenix Framework.
  6. Scalability: Phoenix Framework is known for its built-in support for horizontal scalability through technologies like distributed Erlang, making it easier to scale to handle larger workloads compared to Symfony's standard practices for scaling web applications.

In Summary, the key differences between Phoenix Framework and Symfony lie in their architectural approach, programming languages used, performance capabilities, learning curves, community support, and scalability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Symfony, Phoenix Framework

Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments
Jakes
Jakes

Mar 21, 2021

Decided

#rust @{#elixir}|topic:null| So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

284k views284k
Comments
Filippo
Filippo

Aug 27, 2020

Review

In my humble opinion the best available php platform is "API Platform". I have tried a lot of backend frameworks in the last 10 years, and that is one of the best, at least in the PHP ecosystem. It's based on Symfony, it supports plenty of features like Swagger docs, Rest API, GraphQL. You can plugin React Admin to have a full admin in no time. But the best part in my opinion it's how you can easily extend the backend taking advantage of the ORM Doctrine (which is one of the most mature available across all technologies) and all the plugins of Symfony. The fact that the Doctrine entities are in automatic relation and they can be exposed as GraphQL it's a big win if you have a complex database. It is also possible to reverse engineering an existing database and create automatically all the entities, admin, restapi, graphql endpoints ... welcome to the future :)

45 views45
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony
Symfony
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Forks
9.7K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
8.5K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
6.2K
Followers
1.0K
Votes
1.1K
Votes
678
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
Pros
  • 120
    High performance
  • 76
    Super fast
  • 70
    Rapid development
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Erlang VM
Cons
  • 6
    No jobs
  • 5
    Very difficult
Integrations
CakePHP
CakePHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
Elixir
Elixir

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase