StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Pug vs Twig

Pug vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pug
Pug
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes467
Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8

Pug vs Twig: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Pug and Twig

Pug and Twig are both template engines commonly used in web development, but they differ in several key aspects:

  1. Syntax: Pug, formerly known as Jade, uses indentation-based syntax to structure templates, making it more concise. On the other hand, Twig uses curly braces and angle brackets to define its templating structure, which makes it more similar to HTML syntax.

  2. Language Compatibility: Pug is primarily designed for use with JavaScript and supports JavaScript-specific features, making it better suited for JavaScript-based projects. In contrast, Twig is compatible with multiple programming languages including PHP, making it a more versatile choice for projects that involve different languages.

  3. Extensibility: Pug has a smaller ecosystem of extensions and plugins compared to Twig, limiting its extensibility options. Twig, on the other hand, offers a wide range of extensions and filters that enhance its functionality and allow developers to create more complex templates.

  4. Learning Curve: Pug's syntax can be initially more challenging for beginners due to its indentation-based structure. Twig, although it may have a learning curve as well, is generally easier to understand and read, especially for developers coming from HTML or other similar languages.

  5. Maturity and Community Support: Twig has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of developers, resulting in better documentation, tutorials, and community support. Pug, although gaining popularity, might have fewer resources available in comparison.

  6. Projects and Ecosystem: Pug is commonly used in the Node.js ecosystem, particularly in frameworks like Express.js, whereas Twig is often associated with PHP-based projects, including the popular Symfony framework.

In summary, Pug and Twig differ in their syntax, language compatibility, extensibility, learning curve, community support, and preferred project ecosystems. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pug
Pug
Twig
Twig

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

-
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
382
Followers
1.2K
Followers
157
Votes
467
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Elegant html
  • 90
    Great with nodejs
  • 59
    Open source
  • 59
    Very short syntax
  • 54
    Structured with indentation
Pros
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Pug, Twig?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase