Rainforest QA vs Selenide

Overview

Rainforest QA

Stacks37

Followers68

Votes53

Selenide

Stacks56

Followers85

Votes16

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Rainforest QA vs Selenide: What are the differences?

What is Rainforest QA? Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

What is Selenide? Concise UI tests in JAVA. Selenide is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Rainforest QA and Selenide can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.

Some of the features offered by Rainforest QA are:

Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
Cross Browser Testing
Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing

On the other hand, Selenide provides the following key features:

Concise fluent API for tests
Ajax support for stable tests
Powerful selectors

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rainforest QA, Selenide

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rainforest QA	Selenide
Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.	It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.
Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team; Cross Browser Testing; Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing; Super Fast Results; Test results direct to your Inbox; Support Powered by Engineers; Integrates with your Chat and Bug trackers; Works with Continuous Deployment	Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 37	Stacks 56
Followers 68	Followers 85
Votes 53	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Cross-browser testing 7 Super-simple test creation 7 Powerful API 7 QA 6 Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests	Pros 5 Nice JAVA API 2 Very mature API 2 File upload support 2 Integrated with WebDriverManager project 2 Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework Cons 1 Hybrid page model not possible
Integrations
Slack Codeship Pivotal Tracker HipChat CircleCI Jira	BrowserStack Android Studio Selendroid Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Rainforest QA, Selenide?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

Rainforest QA and Selenide can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.

Some of the features offered by Rainforest QA are:

Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
Cross Browser Testing
Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing

On the other hand, Selenide provides the following key features:

Concise fluent API for tests
Ajax support for stable tests
Powerful selectors

Rainforest QA vs Selenide