Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Rancher vs RancherOS: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Rancher and RancherOS are two different components of the Rancher platform. While both serve a purpose in managing containers and containerized applications, there are several key differences between the two.
Architecture: Rancher is a container management platform that provides a complete solution for managing clusters of containers across multiple hosts. It can be installed on any Linux distribution and provides a web-based interface for managing containers. On the other hand, RancherOS is a minimalist Linux distribution that is focused solely on running containers. It is designed to be lightweight and optimized for running containers without any unnecessary components or services.
Operating System: Rancher is built on top of a traditional Linux distribution and can be installed on any compatible Linux operating system. It provides a comprehensive solution for managing containers and supports various container runtimes. RancherOS, on the other hand, is a standalone operating system that is specifically designed for running containers. It is a minimalistic Linux distribution that eliminates unnecessary components and services, resulting in a smaller footprint and improved container performance.
Container Deployment: Rancher uses a centralized approach to manage containers, where a single Rancher server is used to control multiple container hosts. It provides an intuitive web-based interface for deploying and managing containers across these hosts. RancherOS, on the other hand, follows a decentralized approach where each container host runs its own instance of RancherOS. This allows for greater flexibility and scalability in deploying containers, as each host can operate independently without relying on a central server.
System Services: Rancher includes a wide range of system services that are necessary for running containers, such as Docker, Kubernetes, and networking services. These services are managed and orchestrated by Rancher to provide a seamless experience for container deployment and management. RancherOS, on the other hand, eliminates many of these system services and focuses solely on running containers. It provides a minimalistic environment that is optimized for container performance and efficiency.
Resource Utilization: Rancher is a more resource-intensive solution compared to RancherOS. As a full-fledged container management platform, it requires additional system resources to run the various components and services associated with managing containers. RancherOS, being a minimalist operating system, has a smaller memory and CPU footprint. This makes it more suitable for resource-constrained environments or situations where optimizing container performance is a priority.
Flexibility: Rancher provides a high degree of flexibility and can be used with any Linux distribution. It supports various container runtimes and can be deployed in diverse environments, from on-premises data centers to public cloud platforms. RancherOS, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Docker and is optimized for running Docker containers. It may not be suitable for deployments that require support for alternative container runtimes or have specific compatibility requirements.
In summary, Rancher is a robust container management platform that provides a complete solution for managing containers across multiple hosts. RancherOS, on the other hand, is a minimalist Linux distribution optimized for running Docker containers with a smaller footprint and improved performance.
Pros of Rancher
- Easy to use103
- Open source and totally free79
- Multi-host docker-compose support63
- Load balancing and health check included58
- Simple58
- Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature44
- Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box42
- Only requires docker37
- Multitenant and permission management34
- Easy to use and feature rich29
- Cross cloud compatible11
- Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure11
- Simple and powerful8
- Next-gen platform8
- Very Docker-friendly7
- Support Kubernetes and Swarm6
- Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)6
- Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes6
- Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments6
- High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/76
- Easy to use service catalog5
- Very intuitive UI4
- IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud4
- Awesome support4
- Scalable3
- Requires less infrastructure requirements2
Pros of RancherOS
- System-docker3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Rancher
- Hosting Rancher can be complicated10