Request Metrics vs Thundra

Overview

Thundra

Stacks12

Followers17

Votes6

Request Metrics

Stacks6

Followers4

Votes0

Request Metrics vs Thundra: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Request Metrics and Thundra

Pricing Model: Request Metrics offers a more predictable pricing model with a fixed monthly fee based on the number of monitored hosts, whereas Thundra follows a pay-as-you-go model, charging based on the number of invocations and the metrics data ingested.
Supported Integrations: Request Metrics has a broader range of supported integrations, including popular platforms like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions, as well as traditional server-based applications, whereas Thundra focuses more on serverless technologies and provides in-depth integrations and insights specific to these environments.
Monitoring Capabilities: Request Metrics primarily focuses on providing real-time monitoring of web requests, response times, and error rates to help developers identify performance bottlenecks and optimize their applications, while Thundra offers more extensive observability features, including distributed tracing, code profiling, and deep insights into functions' behavior and dependencies.
User Interface and Dashboard Customization: Thundra provides a highly customizable dashboard interface that allows users to create bespoke visualizations and alerts, whereas Request Metrics offers a more standardized dashboard layout with predefined widgets and metrics, which may limit customization options for some users.
Alerting and Notification Systems: Thundra's alerting and notification system is more advanced, allowing users to set up complex alerting rules based on various metrics and events, and providing integrations with popular notification services like Slack and PagerDuty. In contrast, Request Metrics offers a simpler alerting system that may be sufficient for basic monitoring needs but lacks the flexibility and advanced features of Thundra.
Security and Compliance Features: Thundra places a stronger emphasis on security and compliance, providing features like role-based access control, encryption at rest, and compliance certifications like SOC 2 and GDPR compliance, whereas Request Metrics offers basic security measures but may not meet the stringent requirements of users in highly regulated industries.

In Summary, Request Metrics and Thundra differ in their pricing models, supported integrations, monitoring capabilities, user interface customization, alerting systems, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Thundra	Request Metrics
By eliminating the need for multiple tools in pre-production. Thundra provides observability into the CI process, helps optimize build duration, enables more frequent deployments, higher development productivity, and lower CI costs.	Website performance monitoring, simplified for small teams. It's not a expensive APM "solution" or a complex query language to learn. It is the key metrics you need to know to keep your website running fast and your customers happy.
tracing; testing; shift-left observability; debugging; optimize build duration; metrics; logs; alerting; monitoring; observability into the CI process; distributed tracing	Real-user monitoring;Performance monitoring;Web vitals;Pagespeed;Sitespeed;Website monitoring
Statistics
Stacks 12	Stacks 6
Followers 17	Followers 4
Votes 6	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Provides the most detailed monitoring of any other tool 2 Serverless monitoring	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java PagerDuty Amazon S3 AWS Lambda Splunk Cloud Slack ELK Amazon SQS Splunk Enterprise Amazon DynamoDB	Google Cloud Platform GitHub Slack Stack Overflow

What are some alternatives to Thundra, Request Metrics?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Pingdom

Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of.

Better Stack

Better Stack is a radically better infrastructure monitoring platform that calls the right person on your team if anything goes wrong. Schedule on-call duties, receive helpful alerts, and collaborate on solving incidents faster than ever.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

UptimeRobot

It is all about helping you to keep your websites up. It monitors your websites every 5 minutes and alerts you if your sites are down.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

StatusCake

Monitoring a website is one thing – finding the best way to alert you to downtime another. At StatusCake we give you as many options as possible to decide when & how often you’re contacted. Whether it’s by email, SMS, push notifications for iOS & Android or integration with third party apps including Zapier and PagerDuty – you decide how you want to be alerted and when!

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Related Comparisons

Request Metrics vs Thundra: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Request Metrics and Thundra

Pricing Model: Request Metrics offers a more predictable pricing model with a fixed monthly fee based on the number of monitored hosts, whereas Thundra follows a pay-as-you-go model, charging based on the number of invocations and the metrics data ingested.
Supported Integrations: Request Metrics has a broader range of supported integrations, including popular platforms like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions, as well as traditional server-based applications, whereas Thundra focuses more on serverless technologies and provides in-depth integrations and insights specific to these environments.
Monitoring Capabilities: Request Metrics primarily focuses on providing real-time monitoring of web requests, response times, and error rates to help developers identify performance bottlenecks and optimize their applications, while Thundra offers more extensive observability features, including distributed tracing, code profiling, and deep insights into functions' behavior and dependencies.
User Interface and Dashboard Customization: Thundra provides a highly customizable dashboard interface that allows users to create bespoke visualizations and alerts, whereas Request Metrics offers a more standardized dashboard layout with predefined widgets and metrics, which may limit customization options for some users.
Alerting and Notification Systems: Thundra's alerting and notification system is more advanced, allowing users to set up complex alerting rules based on various metrics and events, and providing integrations with popular notification services like Slack and PagerDuty. In contrast, Request Metrics offers a simpler alerting system that may be sufficient for basic monitoring needs but lacks the flexibility and advanced features of Thundra.
Security and Compliance Features: Thundra places a stronger emphasis on security and compliance, providing features like role-based access control, encryption at rest, and compliance certifications like SOC 2 and GDPR compliance, whereas Request Metrics offers basic security measures but may not meet the stringent requirements of users in highly regulated industries.

In Summary, Request Metrics and Thundra differ in their pricing models, supported integrations, monitoring capabilities, user interface customization, alerting systems, and security features.

Request Metrics vs Thundra

Overview