StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Tools For Text Editors
  5. ReSharper vs SonarQube

ReSharper vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ReSharper
ReSharper
Stacks236
Followers263
Votes24
SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K

ReSharper vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

ReSharper and SonarQube are both helpful tools for code analysis and improvement. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Code Coverage: ReSharper focuses on providing code analysis and refactoring tools within the Integrated Development Environment (IDE), while SonarQube emphasizes code coverage by performing static code analysis and reporting on the overall quality of the codebase.

  2. Integration: ReSharper is tightly integrated with Microsoft Visual Studio and supports multiple programming languages within the IDE, providing real-time code analysis and suggestions. In contrast, SonarQube is a standalone platform that supports a wide range of programming languages and can be integrated into various build systems, providing comprehensive analysis and reporting capabilities.

  3. Static vs Dynamic Analysis: While both tools perform code analysis, ReSharper focuses on dynamic analysis within the IDE, providing suggestions for code improvements as developers write their code. SonarQube, on the other hand, primarily performs static code analysis, analyzing the codebase as a whole to identify potential issues, bugs, and vulnerabilities.

  4. Automation and Continuous Integration: SonarQube is often used in conjunction with Continuous Integration (CI) processes, allowing code analysis to be automatically triggered during the build process. ReSharper, on the other hand, is more focused on providing analysis tools directly to developers within the IDE, although it can also be used in CI pipelines.

  5. Rule Sets and Configurability: ReSharper allows for highly customizable rule sets, giving developers the flexibility to define their own coding standards and preferences. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive set of predefined rules and quality profiles, allowing for a standardized approach to code analysis and quality control across development teams.

  6. Enterprise vs Individual Usage: While ReSharper is primarily targeted towards individual developers and their coding practices, SonarQube is designed for use at an enterprise level, providing centralized code analysis and reporting across development teams.

In summary, ReSharper, a plugin for Visual Studio, provides code analysis, refactoring, and productivity features to improve the coding experience and enforce coding standards within the IDE. SonarQube, on the other hand, is a static code analysis tool that scans codebases for code smells, bugs, and security vulnerabilities, providing comprehensive reports and metrics to help teams improve code quality and maintainability throughout the development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ReSharper
ReSharper
SonarQube
SonarQube

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

-
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
236
Stacks
1.9K
Followers
263
Followers
2.0K
Votes
24
Votes
53
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Refactor also using different code
  • 6
    Early discover bugs
  • 5
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Highlighted //todo //bug
  • 3
    Spell checking
Cons
  • 8
    Visual studio become slower
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Integrations
.NET
.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to ReSharper, SonarQube?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Spacemacs

Spacemacs

Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana