Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Spark vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Apache Spark and scikit-learn
Apache Spark and scikit-learn are both popular frameworks in the field of data science and machine learning. While they have some similarities, they also have some key differences that set them apart. Here are the key differences between Apache Spark and scikit-learn:
Data Processing: Apache Spark is designed to handle big data processing tasks efficiently by distributing the data across a cluster of machines. It can process data in memory or on disk, making it suitable for large-scale data sets. On the other hand, scikit-learn is designed for smaller data sets that can fit into memory. It operates on a single machine and is not optimized for distributed computing.
Machine Learning Algorithms: Apache Spark provides a comprehensive set of machine learning algorithms that can handle large-scale datasets. It includes algorithms for classification, regression, clustering, recommendation systems, and more. In contrast, scikit-learn offers a wide range of machine learning algorithms as well, but it focuses on traditional machine learning techniques and does not have as many options for big data processing.
Ease of Use: Scikit-learn is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides a straightforward API that is easy to understand and use, making it popular among beginners and researchers. Apache Spark, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires knowledge of distributed computing concepts. It is often used by engineers and data scientists who work with big data.
Scale: One of the major differences between Apache Spark and scikit-learn is their scalability. Apache Spark is designed to scale horizontally by adding more machines to the cluster, allowing it to handle large-scale data processing tasks efficiently. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, is limited by the resources of a single machine and can only handle smaller datasets.
Integration with Big Data Ecosystem: Apache Spark integrates well with other big data technologies such as Hadoop, Hive, and HBase. It can read and write data from and to various data sources, making it a powerful tool for big data analytics. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, is primarily focused on machine learning and does not have built-in support for big data integration.
Community and Ecosystem: Both Apache Spark and scikit-learn have a large and active community of users and developers. However, the ecosystems around these frameworks are quite different. Apache Spark has a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools that extend its functionality, such as Spark SQL, Spark Streaming, and MLlib. Scikit-learn also has a growing ecosystem of libraries, but it is not as extensive as Apache Spark's.
In summary, Apache Spark and scikit-learn differ in terms of data processing capabilities, machine learning algorithms, ease of use, scalability, integration with big data technologies, and the size of their respective ecosystems. Choosing between these frameworks depends on the specific requirements of the project and the size of the dataset.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
Pros of scikit-learn
- Scientific computing26
- Easy19
Pros of Apache Spark
- Open-source61
- Fast and Flexible48
- One platform for every big data problem8
- Great for distributed SQL like applications8
- Easy to install and to use6
- Works well for most Datascience usecases3
- Interactive Query2
- Machine learning libratimery, Streaming in real2
- In memory Computation2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of scikit-learn
- Limited2
Cons of Apache Spark
- Speed4