Selenium vs Testsigma

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Testsigma

Stacks8

Followers29

Votes0

Selenium vs Testsigma: What are the differences?

Selenium is an open-source web automation tool that primarily focuses on automating browsers. It allows users to write scripts in various programming languages for automating web applications. On the other hand, Testsigma is a cloud-based test automation tool that simplifies the process of test creation and execution. It provides a codeless interface and supports both web and mobile applications. Now, let's discuss the key differences between Selenium and Testsigma.

User Interface: Selenium requires users to have programming knowledge and expertise to write code for test automation. It offers flexibility and control by allowing users to write custom code, but it also involves a steep learning curve. On the other hand, Testsigma provides a codeless interface that makes it easy for even non-technical users to create and execute tests. The intuitive interface of Testsigma simplifies the test automation process, reducing the dependency on programming skills.
Maintenance Effort: When using Selenium, regular maintenance is required as any changes in the application's user interface can break the existing test scripts. Test scripts need to be updated continuously to ensure their compatibility with the latest versions of the application. Testsigma, on the other hand, reduces the maintenance effort significantly. It uses the concept of a natural language-like representation of test steps, allowing easy maintenance and adaptability even when there are changes in the application's UI.
Test Execution Speed: Selenium-based test scripts are executed directly on the local setup, which might result in slower test execution speed, especially when running tests in parallel. Testsigma, on the other hand, offers cloud-based test execution, ensuring faster test execution. It uses a distributed grid for parallel and simultaneous execution of test scripts across multiple devices and browsers, reducing the overall execution time.
Compatibility: Selenium supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, and more. This allows users to choose a language they are familiar with or prefer. Testsigma, on the other hand, supports only a limited number of languages, such as Java and JavaScript. While this may restrict some users, it simplifies the process for beginners by reducing the language options and providing a more streamlined experience.
Test Reusability: Selenium allows users to create reusable code snippets and functions that can be used across multiple test scripts, enhancing test reusability. Testsigma takes test reusability to the next level with its reusable test modules. These modules are self-contained and can be easily reused across different projects, reducing redundant efforts and improving overall efficiency.
Reporting and Analytics: Selenium provides basic reporting capabilities through frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users need to configure and customize these frameworks to generate comprehensive test reports. Testsigma, on the other hand, offers built-in reporting and analytics features. It provides detailed test reports with interactive dashboards, allowing users to track the test execution progress, identify bottlenecks, and make data-driven decisions.

In summary, Selenium requires programming knowledge, has higher maintenance effort, slower test execution speed, supports multiple languages, provides test reusability, and requires additional setup for reporting. Testsigma offers a codeless interface, reduces maintenance effort, provides faster test execution speed, supports limited languages, enhances test reusability with reusable test modules, and offers built-in reporting and analytics features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, Testsigma

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Testsigma
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	A Unified platform for Web, Mobile apps and API services' Automated Testing, It is test automation ecosystem with all the essential elements required for Agile & Continuous Delivery teams. Automated tests are written in simple English & involves no complex coding but with the flexibility that enterprise teams need. The tests can be run in parallel on thousands of device/OS/browser combos and physical mobile devices on a massive device cloud as well as on your local machines. It lets you drill down to specific test environments and identify what failed and why.
-	AI-Driven Maintenance; Automated Regression Testing; Automated Data-Driven Testing; Automated Cross-Browser Testing; Automated Web Application Testing; Automated Mobile Apps(Android & iOS)Testing; Automated Web Services Testing; Reusable Step Groups; Test Data Management; Activity, history of your tests; Centralized Object/Element Repository; Global Test Data Management; Custom Functions; Parallel Test Execution; Cross-Platform Testing; Massive Real devices' cloud; Local Test Executions; Schedulers; Comprehensive Visual Reports; Integration with CI/CD tools, Collaboration tools; Test Management; Requirements Management; Team Collaboration; Test Development Trend; Version Control; Automatic Bug Reporting; Email and Slack Notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 8
Followers 12.6K	Followers 29
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux iOS Jenkins Slack BrowserStack Android OS CircleCI Sauce Labs Jira Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Testsigma?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

Selenium vs Testsigma: What are the differences?

User Interface: Selenium requires users to have programming knowledge and expertise to write code for test automation. It offers flexibility and control by allowing users to write custom code, but it also involves a steep learning curve. On the other hand, Testsigma provides a codeless interface that makes it easy for even non-technical users to create and execute tests. The intuitive interface of Testsigma simplifies the test automation process, reducing the dependency on programming skills.
Maintenance Effort: When using Selenium, regular maintenance is required as any changes in the application's user interface can break the existing test scripts. Test scripts need to be updated continuously to ensure their compatibility with the latest versions of the application. Testsigma, on the other hand, reduces the maintenance effort significantly. It uses the concept of a natural language-like representation of test steps, allowing easy maintenance and adaptability even when there are changes in the application's UI.
Test Execution Speed: Selenium-based test scripts are executed directly on the local setup, which might result in slower test execution speed, especially when running tests in parallel. Testsigma, on the other hand, offers cloud-based test execution, ensuring faster test execution. It uses a distributed grid for parallel and simultaneous execution of test scripts across multiple devices and browsers, reducing the overall execution time.
Compatibility: Selenium supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, and more. This allows users to choose a language they are familiar with or prefer. Testsigma, on the other hand, supports only a limited number of languages, such as Java and JavaScript. While this may restrict some users, it simplifies the process for beginners by reducing the language options and providing a more streamlined experience.
Test Reusability: Selenium allows users to create reusable code snippets and functions that can be used across multiple test scripts, enhancing test reusability. Testsigma takes test reusability to the next level with its reusable test modules. These modules are self-contained and can be easily reused across different projects, reducing redundant efforts and improving overall efficiency.
Reporting and Analytics: Selenium provides basic reporting capabilities through frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users need to configure and customize these frameworks to generate comprehensive test reports. Testsigma, on the other hand, offers built-in reporting and analytics features. It provides detailed test reports with interactive dashboards, allowing users to track the test execution progress, identify bottlenecks, and make data-driven decisions.

Selenium vs Testsigma

Overview