Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Instana vs SignalFx: What are the differences?
Developers describe Instana as "Automatic Application and Infrastructure Monitoring". Instana is the Application Performance Management solution for modern dynamic applications, using automation and AI to manage their service quality. On the other hand, SignalFx is detailed as "Monitoring and Operational Intelligence for the Cloud". We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data.
Instana and SignalFx belong to "Performance Monitoring" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Instana are:
- Full integration into the Instana Dynamic Graph
- Relevant metric collection
- Fully AI enabled behavioral learning
On the other hand, SignalFx provides the following key features:
- Beautiful streaming visualizations
- Meaningful, fast alerting using SignalFlow analytics
- High resolution metrics up to 1 sec
Pros of Instana
- Flexible pricing4
- Easy to integrate4
- Insight into RCA3
- Self service3
- Simple query interface2
- Automatic1
Pros of SignalFx
- High cardinality5
- Scalability5
- World class customer support4
- Easy to install4
- Fastest alerts4
