Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Datadog vs SignalFx: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Here, we will present the key differences between Datadog and SignalFx in Markdown code format, which can be used in a website.
Deployment and Scalability: Datadog provides a wide range of deployment options, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid setups. It offers greater flexibility in scaling with various infrastructure sizes, making it suitable for both small and large organizations. On the other hand, SignalFx primarily focuses on a cloud-native architecture, designed to handle massive scalability and high data volumes, making it an ideal choice for cloud-centric environments.
Monitoring and Observability: Datadog offers a comprehensive monitoring platform that combines infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), log management, and more. It provides a unified view of metrics, traces, and logs, making it easier to troubleshoot and identify performance bottlenecks. SignalFx, on the other hand, emphasizes real-time observability, using a streaming analytics engine that enables real-time metrics and anomaly detection. It excels in providing immediate insights into dynamic, highly distributed systems.
Integration and Ecosystem: Datadog has a vast ecosystem of integrations, supporting numerous third-party tools and technologies. It offers native integrations with popular cloud providers, databases, web servers, and more, making it easy to monitor a wide range of applications and infrastructure components. SignalFx also provides a rich set of integrations, with a focus on cloud-native technologies like Kubernetes, Prometheus, and OpenTelemetry. Its integrations are geared towards monitoring modern, containerized applications.
Visualization and Dashboards: Datadog offers a visually appealing and customizable dashboard experience. It provides drag-and-drop widgets, custom graphing options, and extensive libraries to create advanced visualization of metrics and logs. SignalFx, on the other hand, emphasizes real-time dashboarding and data exploration. It provides interactive dashboards with built-in charts and predefined templates, allowing users to explore and drill down into data easily.
Pricing and Plans: Datadog offers a tiered pricing model based on the scale of infrastructure and features required. It provides a free plan for limited usage and several paid plans with additional features. SignalFx, on the other hand, follows a consumption-based pricing model, where users only pay for the ingested data volume. It offers a free trial and flexible pricing options, making it attractive for organizations with varying scalability needs.
Machine Learning and Analytics: Datadog leverages machine learning algorithms to analyze metrics and logs, enabling anomaly detection, forecasting, and automated alerting. It provides out-of-the-box machine learning features that help identify unusual behavior and patterns in data. SignalFx also incorporates machine learning and advanced analytics capabilities to proactively identify anomalies and provide predictive alerts. Its analytics engine allows users to investigate and correlate data with machine learning-driven insights.
In Summary, Datadog and SignalFx differ in aspects such as deployment and scalability options, monitoring and observability approaches, integrations and ecosystem support, visualization and dashboards, pricing and plans, as well as the extent of machine learning and analytics capabilities.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
Coming from a Ruby background, we've been users of New Relic for quite some time. When we adopted Elixir, the New Relic integration was young and missing essential features, so we gave AppSignal a try. It worked for quite some time, we even implemented a :telemetry reporter for AppSignal . But it was difficult to correlate data in two monitoring solutions, New Relic was undergoing a UI overhaul which made it difficult to use, and AppSignal was missing the flexibility we needed. We had some fans of Datadog, so we gave it a try and it worked out perfectly. Datadog works great with Ruby , Elixir , JavaScript , and has powerful features our engineers love to use (notebooks, dashboards, very flexible alerting). Cherry on top - thanks to the Datadog Terraform provider everything is written as code, allowing us to collaborate on our Datadog setup.
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of Datadog
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)137
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations83
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Custom metrics41
- Notifications41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- AWS support7
- In-context collaboration7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cost4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Automation tools4
- Cute logo4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Best than others4
- Expensive3
- Best in the field3
- Free setup3
- Good for Startups3
- APM2
Pros of SignalFx
- High cardinality5
- Scalability5
- World class customer support4
- Easy to install4
- Fastest alerts4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Datadog
- Expensive19
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
Cons of SignalFx
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Datadog?
What is SignalFx?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+31
+22
+46+34+37+26
+44