StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Slack vs Zoho Cliq

Slack vs Zoho Cliq

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slack
Slack
Stacks120.8K
Followers97.7K
Votes6.0K
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq
Stacks22
Followers29
Votes0

Slack vs Zoho Cliq: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Slack and Zoho Cliq

Slack and Zoho Cliq are both team collaboration platforms that offer a range of features to enhance communication and productivity within organizations. However, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. User Interface and Design: Slack has a modern and intuitive user interface that is visually appealing and easy to navigate. It provides a clean and organized workspace with customizable themes and layouts. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq focuses more on simplicity and functionality with a minimalist design that prioritizes functionality over aesthetics.

  2. Integrations and Third-party Apps: Slack has a vast ecosystem of integrations and third-party apps, allowing users to connect with various tools and services seamlessly. It supports over 2,000 integrations, including popular apps like Google Drive, Trello, and Salesforce. Zoho Cliq, while also offering integrations, has a more limited selection of around 100 integrations, primarily focused on Zoho's suite of applications.

  3. Pricing and Plans: Slack offers a tiered pricing structure, with different plans based on the size and needs of the organization. It provides a free plan with limited features, as well as paid plans that offer more advanced functionalities and additional storage. Zoho Cliq, on the other hand, follows a more straightforward pricing model, offering a single plan with all features included at a competitive price point.

  4. File Sharing and Storage: Slack allows users to upload and share files within the platform, with a limit of 5 GB for each workspace. However, the free plan has a 5 GB limit for the entire team. Zoho Cliq offers unlimited file storage, regardless of the plan, enabling users to share and collaborate on files without worrying about storage limitations.

  5. Search Capabilities: Slack provides powerful search capabilities, allowing users to look for specific messages, files, or conversations using keywords and filters. It also offers advanced search features, such as searching within specific channels or for messages from specific users. Zoho Cliq, while also offering search functionality, is not as robust as Slack, lacking some of the advanced search options.

  6. Customization and Branding: Slack allows users to customize their workspace by adding company logos, changing color schemes, and modifying the overall appearance to reflect their brand identity. Zoho Cliq, while it does offer some customization options, is more limited in terms of branding and visual customization.

In Summary, Slack offers a more visually appealing user interface and a wider range of integrations, while Zoho Cliq focuses on simplicity, unlimited file storage, and a straightforward pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Slack, Zoho Cliq

Remotor
Remotor

Apr 13, 2020

Decided

Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.

Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.

Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).

Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.

Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)

132k views132k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceonGitterGitterDiscordDiscordSpectrumSpectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M
Comments
Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Slack
Slack
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

It is a business communication app that includes real-time messaging, task management and automation. You can share files and make audio or video calls, right from within your chat channels. it is loaded with features to keep teams productive and cohesive.

Create open channels for the projects, groups and topics that the whole team shares.;Search with context;Autocomplete makes mentioning your teammates quick and painless.;Configurable notifications for desktop, mobile push and email keep you as informed as you’d like.;Everything is perfectly in sync as you move between your desktop, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.;Powerful search & archiving means you can forget when you need to: we’ll remember for you.;Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub Integration;Add comments for feedback & stars for easy retrieval;Built-in internal and external sharing options ensure you can get and share any file with anyone
Collaboration; Video Broadcasting for Teams; Work Remotely
Statistics
Stacks
120.8K
Stacks
22
Followers
97.7K
Followers
29
Votes
6.0K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1209
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
Cons
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
  • 5
    Too expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Zapier
Zapier
Stripe
Stripe
Asana
Asana
GoSquared
GoSquared
Dropbox
Dropbox
New Relic
New Relic
Google Drive
Google Drive
Zendesk
Zendesk
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Slack, Zoho Cliq?

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack