StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. SonarLint vs SonarQube

SonarLint vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

SonarLint vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

In today's software development industry, code quality is of utmost importance. Tools like SonarLint and SonarQube play a vital role in helping developers improve the quality of their code. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Deployment and Usage: SonarLint is a lightweight IDE extension that can be installed directly in code editors like IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio. It analyzes the code as it is being written and provides real-time feedback to developers. On the other hand, SonarQube is a more comprehensive code analysis tool that is deployed on a server and can be accessed via a web interface. It is capable of analyzing larger codebases and offers more advanced features for code quality management.

  2. Scope of Analysis: SonarLint primarily focuses on the code being developed or edited by the developer in their specific IDE. It provides instant feedback on code issues, bugs, and vulnerabilities. SonarLint analyzes code locally without the need for a server or centralized setup. In contrast, SonarQube can analyze code across an entire project or organization. It offers a centralized platform for managing code quality, providing in-depth analysis of various metrics, historical trends, and cross-project comparisons.

  3. Integration and Collaboration: SonarLint supports integration with SonarQube, allowing developers to leverage the benefits of both tools. It synchronizes the rules and settings between SonarLint and SonarQube servers, ensuring consistent code analysis across different environments. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides features for collaboration and reporting. It allows multiple developers to work together, share reports, and track code improvements over time.

  4. Rule Customization and Configurability: SonarLint offers a limited set of default rules that are constantly updated and maintained by the SonarSource team. Developers can customize these rules to some extent according to their project requirements. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides a rich set of rulesets that can be customized extensively to fit specific coding standards, development guidelines, and industry best practices. It allows administrators to configure quality profiles, activate or deactivate rules, and enforce coding rules across the entire project or organization.

  5. Scalability and Enterprise Support: SonarLint is designed to be lightweight and fast, making it suitable for individual developers or small teams working on small to medium-sized projects. SonarQube, on the other hand, is built to handle large codebases and can scale to enterprise-level deployments. It offers enterprise-grade support options, including SLAs, priority bug fixes, and access to additional features like code security analysis and code coverage.

  6. License and Cost: SonarLint is an open-source tool released under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). It is available for free and can be used by individual developers or organizations without any licensing costs. SonarQube, on the other hand, comes with different licensing options, including a free community edition with limited features and paid editions with additional capabilities, support, and services.

In summary, SonarLint is a lightweight IDE extension that provides real-time code analysis, while SonarQube is a comprehensive code analysis tool that offers advanced features, scalability, and enterprise support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
SonarLint
SonarLint

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
175
Followers
2.0K
Followers
352
Votes
53
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana