Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
SonarQube vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
- SonarQube: SonarQube is a static code analysis tool that analyzes code for bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells. It provides detailed reports and metrics to help developers improve the quality of their code.
Visual Studio Code: Visual Studio Code is a lightweight and versatile code editor that supports a wide range of programming languages. It offers features such as debugging, version control integration, and a vast collection of extensions for customization.
Integration: One key difference between SonarQube and Visual Studio Code is their level of integration. SonarQube is designed as a standalone platform that requires a separate server installation and analysis runs. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code integrates various development tools and services directly into the editor, allowing for a seamless development experience.
Code Analysis: SonarQube is specifically built for code analysis and provides comprehensive static code analysis capabilities. It can detect a wide range of issues, including security vulnerabilities, bugs, and code smells. In contrast, Visual Studio Code offers some built-in code analysis features, but it primarily relies on third-party extensions to provide more advanced analysis capabilities.
Scalability: SonarQube is designed to handle large codebases and can analyze code projects of any size. It is capable of analyzing code across multiple languages and can generate detailed reports and metrics for the entire codebase. Visual Studio Code, being a lightweight code editor, may not be as scalable for analyzing massive codebases and does not provide the same level of detailed reports.
Enterprise Features: SonarQube offers various enterprise-level features that are designed for large-scale software development projects. It includes features like project and portfolio management, quality gates, and integration with popular CI/CD tools. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is geared more towards individual developers and does not offer the same level of enterprise features.
In Summary, SonarQube is a standalone code analysis platform with comprehensive analysis capabilities and enterprise features, while Visual Studio Code is a lightweight code editor with integration capabilities and extensibility through third-party extensions.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of SonarQube
- Tracks code complexity and smell trends26
- IDE Integration16
- Complete code Review9
- Difficult to deploy2
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of SonarQube
- Sales process is long and unfriendly7
- Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful7
- Does not integrate with Snyk1
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1
