Spinnaker vs Weave Flux

Overview

Spinnaker

Stacks233

Followers358

Votes14

GitHub Stars9.6K

Forks1.2K

Weaveworks Flux

Stacks22

Followers28

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.9K

Forks1.1K

Spinnaker vs Weave Flux: What are the differences?

Deployment Methodology: Spinnaker utilizes a pipeline concept where each stage represents a step in the deployment process, allowing for manual approvals, canary deployments, and rollbacks. Weave Flux, on the other hand, follows a GitOps approach where all deployments are automated based on changes in a Git repository, promoting declarative configuration across environments.
Supported Platforms: Spinnaker supports a wide range of cloud providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and Kubernetes, making it a versatile choice for multi-cloud deployments. In comparison, Weave Flux primarily focuses on Kubernetes and Git as its primary platforms, optimizing continuous delivery for containerized applications.
Community Support: Spinnaker has a large and active community with frequent updates, plugins, and support available. Weave Flux, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community footprint, potentially impacting the availability of resources and troubleshooting assistance.
Customization Capabilities: Spinnaker offers extensive customization options through its plugins and extensible architecture, allowing users to tailor the deployment process to their specific needs. Weave Flux, while flexible, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to Spinnaker.
User Interface: Spinnaker provides a comprehensive web-based UI for managing pipelines, deployments, and infrastructure configurations, offering a visual representation of the deployment process. Weave Flux, on the other hand, relies heavily on command-line tools and Git workflows for managing deployments and configurations, potentially requiring a higher learning curve for users.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Spinnaker integrates seamlessly with various CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enhancing the overall automation and deployment workflow. Weave Flux, while compatible with CI/CD pipelines, may require additional configurations for optimal integration with certain tools.

In Summary, the key differences between Spinnaker and Weave Flux lie in their deployment methodology, supported platforms, community support, customization capabilities, user interface, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spinnaker	Weaveworks Flux
Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.	It is the operator that makes GitOps happen in your cluster. It ensures that the cluster config matches the one in git and automates your deployments.
-	Automate Deployment; Increase Speed and Reliability; Troubleshoot Efficiently
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.6K	GitHub Stars 6.9K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 233	Stacks 22
Followers 358	Followers 28
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Mature Cons 3 No GitOps 1 Configuration time 1 Management overhead 1 Ease of use	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Stackdriver Packer Prometheus Chef Jenkins Docker Puppet Labs Amazon EC2 GitHub Google Kubernetes Engine	Kubernetes Jenkins Amazon EC2 Docker Git GitHub Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Spinnaker, Weaveworks Flux?

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Related Comparisons

Spinnaker vs Weave Flux: What are the differences?

Deployment Methodology: Spinnaker utilizes a pipeline concept where each stage represents a step in the deployment process, allowing for manual approvals, canary deployments, and rollbacks. Weave Flux, on the other hand, follows a GitOps approach where all deployments are automated based on changes in a Git repository, promoting declarative configuration across environments.
Supported Platforms: Spinnaker supports a wide range of cloud providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and Kubernetes, making it a versatile choice for multi-cloud deployments. In comparison, Weave Flux primarily focuses on Kubernetes and Git as its primary platforms, optimizing continuous delivery for containerized applications.
Community Support: Spinnaker has a large and active community with frequent updates, plugins, and support available. Weave Flux, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community footprint, potentially impacting the availability of resources and troubleshooting assistance.
Customization Capabilities: Spinnaker offers extensive customization options through its plugins and extensible architecture, allowing users to tailor the deployment process to their specific needs. Weave Flux, while flexible, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to Spinnaker.
User Interface: Spinnaker provides a comprehensive web-based UI for managing pipelines, deployments, and infrastructure configurations, offering a visual representation of the deployment process. Weave Flux, on the other hand, relies heavily on command-line tools and Git workflows for managing deployments and configurations, potentially requiring a higher learning curve for users.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Spinnaker integrates seamlessly with various CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enhancing the overall automation and deployment workflow. Weave Flux, while compatible with CI/CD pipelines, may require additional configurations for optimal integration with certain tools.

Spinnaker vs Weave Flux

Overview