Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Travis CI
Travis CI

4.4K
3.1K
+ 1
1.7K
Vespene
Vespene

2
6
+ 1
0
Add tool

Travis CI vs Vespene: What are the differences?

What is Travis CI? A hosted continuous integration service for open source and private projects. Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

What is Vespene? *Python CI/CD and automation server written in Django *. Vespene is a modern, streamlined build and self-service automation platform. Vespene is designed to combat chaos in complex software development and operations environments. As you might expect of any build system, builds can be launched manually, triggered from commits with Webhooks, or set off on timers with Scheduling.

Travis CI and Vespene can be categorized as "Continuous Integration" tools.

Vespene is an open source tool with 699 GitHub stars and 83 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Vespene's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Travis CI?

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

What is Vespene?

Vespene is a modern, streamlined build and self-service automation platform. Vespene is designed to combat chaos in complex software development and operations environments. As you might expect of any build system, builds can be launched manually, triggered from commits with Webhooks, or set off on timers with Scheduling.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Travis CI?
Why do developers choose Vespene?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Travis CI?
      What companies use Vespene?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Travis CI?
        What tools integrate with Vespene?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Travis CI and Vespene?
        Jenkins
        In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
        CircleCI
        Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
        GitLab CI
        GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
        GitLab
        GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
        Bamboo
        Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Travis CI and Vespene
        Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
        Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
        Telecomm Engineering at Netbeast | 10 upvotes 139.3K views
        atNetbeastNetbeast
        Mailjet
        Mailjet
        Intercom
        Intercom
        Amplitude
        Amplitude
        Firebase
        Firebase
        GitHub
        GitHub
        Bitrise
        Bitrise
        Travis CI
        Travis CI
        Objective-C
        Objective-C
        Android SDK
        Android SDK
        React Native
        React Native
        #SmartHome
        #End2end

        We are using React Native in #SmartHome to share the business logic between Android and iOS team and approach users with a unique brand experience. The drawback is that we require lots of native Android SDK and Objective-C modules, so a good part of the invested time is there. The gain for a app that relies less on native communication, sensors and OS tools should be even higher.

        Also it helps us set different testing stages: we use Travis CI for the javascript (business logic), Bitrise to run build tests and @Detox for #end2end automated user tests.

        We use a microservices structure on top of Zeit's @now that read from firebase. We use JWT auth to authenticate requests among services and from users, following GitHub philosophy of using the same infrastructure than its API consumers. Firebase is used mainly as a key-value store between services and as a backup database for users. We also use its authentication mechanisms.

        You can be super locked-in if you also rely on it's analytics, but we use Amplitude for that, which offers us great insights. Intercom for communications with end-user and Mailjet for marketing.

        See more
        Travis CI
        Travis CI
        CircleCI
        CircleCI

        I initially chose CircleCI for a personal project because I was not satisified with using Travis CI in the past. When it came time to develop my CI/CD config on Circle, I was pleasantly surprised with the fantastic documentation, invaluable collection of example configs and helpful support provided. The free tier they provide is quite robust for most small projects and the platform is updated frequently with nice features.

        Areas where CircleCI could improve:

        • the UI is a bit slow (you can feel the local machine straining to load all the code) and it is not as intuitive as it could be
        • many UI elements receive updates and/or changes that are not always reflected in the current docs
        See more
        GitHub
        GitHub
        Appveyor
        Appveyor
        Travis CI
        Travis CI

        I recommend using Travis CI and/or Appveyor in all projects.

        Projects using these tools have given me confidence to know that I don't cause any breaking changes. Travis CI and Appveyor have functionality to test components of a project across multiple installation projects to ensure that modifications don't break a project. These tools integrate easily with GitHub and are useful in open source projects that must review contributions from many different people.

        See more
        Tim Abbott
        Tim Abbott
        Founder at Zulip | 12 upvotes 35.6K views
        atZulipZulip
        CircleCI
        CircleCI
        Travis CI
        Travis CI

        We actually started out on Travis CI, but we've migrated our main builds to CircleCI, and it's been a huge improvement.

        The reason it's been a huge improvement is that Travis CI has a fundamentally bad design for their images, where they start with a standard base Linux image containing tons of packages (several versions of postgres, every programming language environment, etc). This is potentially nice for the "get builds for a small project running quickly" use case, but it's a total disaster for a larger project that needs a decent number of dependencies and cares about the performance and reliability of their build.

        This issue is exacerbated by their networking infrastructure being unreliable; we usually saw over 1% of builds failing due to transient networking errors in Travis CI, even after we added retries to the most frequently failing operations like apt update or pip install. And they never install Ubuntu's point release updates to their images. So doing an apt update, apt install, or especially apt upgrade would take forever. We ended up writing code to actually uninstall many of their base packages and pin the versions of hundreds of others to get a semi-fast, semi-reliable build. It was infuriating.

        The CircleCI v2.0 system has the right design for a CI system: we can customize the base image to start with any expensive-to-install packages we need for our build, and we can update that image if and when we want to. The end result is that when migrating, we were able to delete all the hacky optimizations mentioned above, while still ending up with a 50% faster build latency. And we've also had 5-10x fewer issues with networking-related flakes, which means one doesn't have to constantly check whether a build failure is actually due to an issue with the code under test or "just another networking flake".

        See more
        Travis CI
        Travis CI
        CircleCI
        CircleCI
        Google Cloud Build
        Google Cloud Build

        I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI.

        I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP.

        One of the unique things is that it has the Kaniko cache, which speeds up builds by creating intermediate layers within the docker image vs. pushing the full thing from the start. Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies.

        Feel free to checkout an example: Cloudbuild Example

        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Travis CI and Vespene
        Avatar of tschellenbach
        CEO at Stream
        Review ofTravis CITravis CI

        In the past we used to run Jenkins. The build server always had weird issues and was a pain to maintain. Travis is a great solution for CI. Their Debug build features makes it trivial to figure out why your build broke. The integration with Github is also very slick. One thing they could improve is the documentation on the .travis.yaml format. All in all, great company and very responsive supports. Over here at getstream.io we're a fan. Keep up the good work guys!

        How developers use Travis CI and Vespene
        Avatar of datapile
        datapile uses Travis CITravis CI

        Travis CI is our pillar for automated deployment, pull request testing, auto-merging (for non-mission-critical projects), and build testing per commit / release.

        It is highly configurable, super cheap, and extremely robust (supports every language and configuration we've thrown at it).

        Avatar of P膿teris Caune
        P膿teris Caune uses Travis CITravis CI

        While we usually run tests before commits, Travis goes further and tests with different Python versions and different database backends. It works great, and, best of all, it is free for open source projects.

        Avatar of Dieter Adriaenssens
        Dieter Adriaenssens uses Travis CITravis CI

        Travis CI builds and tests every commit. It's also used to deploy Buildtime Trend as a Service to Heroku and the Buildtime Trend Python library to the PyPi repository.

        Avatar of Nate Ferrell
        Nate Ferrell uses Travis CITravis CI

        Travis CI is critical for Linux and macOS CI tests for the Powershell module. Travis runs the same tests we run in AppVeyor in parallel.

        Avatar of Andrew Williams
        Andrew Williams uses Travis CITravis CI

        To ensure that what works locally will also work for someone else. Also used to send code coverage to codeintel

        How much does Travis CI cost?
        How much does Vespene cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Vespene
        More news