StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. Vagrant vs VirtualBox

Vagrant vs VirtualBox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Stacks31.1K
Followers25.6K
Votes1.1K

Vagrant vs VirtualBox: What are the differences?

Vagrant is a higher-level abstraction tool that facilitates the creation and management of reproducible development environments, while VirtualBox serves as a powerful open-source hypervisor responsible for running and hosting these virtual machines across various operating systems. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Virtual Machine Management: Vagrant is a tool developed specifically for managing virtual machines, while VirtualBox is a virtualization software that allows users to create and manage virtual machines. Vagrant acts as a wrapper around VirtualBox, providing a more user-friendly and streamlined approach to managing virtual machines.

  2. Configuration: Vagrant uses a configuration file called Vagrantfile, where users can define the settings and specifications of the virtual machine they want to create. On the other hand, VirtualBox requires manual configuration through its user interface, making it more time-consuming and complex for users to set up virtual machines.

  3. Portable Environments: Vagrant allows users to easily create and share portable development environments. With just a Vagrantfile and the required dependencies, developers can replicate the same development environment across different machines and operating systems. VirtualBox, on the other hand, requires users to export and import virtual machines to achieve similar portability.

  4. Collaboration: Vagrant simplifies collaboration among team members by providing a consistent development environment that can be easily shared and replicated. Multiple developers can work on the same project using identical virtual machines, reducing compatibility issues. VirtualBox does not offer the same level of collaboration features and may require additional steps to ensure consistency across team members.

  5. Command Line Interface: Vagrant offers a powerful command-line interface (CLI) that allows users to perform various actions, such as provisioning, starting, stopping, and destroying virtual machines. This CLI makes it easier for developers to automate tasks and integrate Vagrant into their existing workflows. VirtualBox also has a command-line interface, but it has fewer features and is not as developer-friendly as Vagrant's CLI.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Vagrant has a large and active community, providing extensive support, documentation, and a wide range of plugins and configurations. These plugins can extend the functionality of Vagrant and integrate it with other tools and technologies. VirtualBox has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Vagrant, resulting in fewer resources and plugins available for users.

In summary, Vagrant simplifies virtual machine management by providing a user-friendly interface, portable environments, collaboration features, a powerful CLI, and a vibrant community, whereas VirtualBox requires more manual configuration, lacks advanced collaboration features, and has a smaller ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
VirtualBox
VirtualBox

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
Portability;No hardware virtualization required;Guest Additions: shared folders, seamless windows, 3D virtualization;Great hardware support;Multigeneration branched snapshots;VM groups;Clean architecture; unprecedented modularity;Remote machine display
Statistics
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
31.1K
Followers
7.8K
Followers
25.6K
Votes
1.5K
Votes
1.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 358
    Free
  • 231
    Easy
  • 169
    Default for vagrant
  • 110
    Fast
  • 73
    Starts quickly
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, VirtualBox?

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana