Applitools vs Ghost Inspector

Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

Applitools

Stacks62

Followers163

Votes15

Applitools vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of automated testing, Applitools and Ghost Inspector are two popular tools that aim to streamline the testing process for software applications. While both tools offer similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two that cater to different needs and preferences of developers and testers.

Visual Testing Approach: Applitools primarily focuses on visual testing, allowing users to compare screenshots for visual differences across different browser sizes and devices. On the other hand, Ghost Inspector offers traditional functional testing and also includes visual testing capabilities, but it is not as robust and feature-rich as Applitools in terms of visual testing.
Ease of Use: Applitools is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for users to set up and manage test cases. Ghost Inspector, although user-friendly as well, may require a bit more technical expertise to fully leverage its capabilities, especially when it comes to visual testing.
Integration and Compatibility: Applitools offers seamless integration with popular testing frameworks and CI/CD tools, making it a preferred choice for teams already using such tools. Ghost Inspector also provides integration options, but it may not be as extensive as Applitools, which could be a deciding factor for teams heavily reliant on integrations.
Scalability: Applitools is designed to handle large-scale test automation projects efficiently, thanks to its highly scalable infrastructure and advanced parallel testing capabilities. While Ghost Inspector can also handle scalability, it may not be as optimized for larger projects compared to Applitools.
Customization and Flexibility: Applitools provides a high level of customization options, allowing users to tailor their testing processes according to their specific requirements. Ghost Inspector, while flexible in its own right, may have certain limitations in terms of customization and flexibility compared to Applitools.

In Summary, Applitools shines in visual testing capabilities, ease of use, extensive integrations, scalability, and customization options, while Ghost Inspector may appeal to users looking for a balance between functional and visual testing with moderate customization and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	Applitools
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	Applitools delivers the next generation of test automation powered by AI assisted computer vision technology known as Visual AI. Visual AI helps Developers, Test Automation Engineers and QA professionals release high-quality web and mobile
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	Integration with functional testing tools;Automated visual comparisons of application pages;Validation interface;Share bug reports with team & ticketing systems;SDKs for common languages
Statistics
Stacks 64	Stacks 62
Followers 117	Followers 163
Votes 22	Votes 15
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 No code required 3 Simple test editor 3 Runscope integration 2 Videos of every test run 2 Screenshot comparison Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Load & Performance testing 0 Flash Support inside browser	Pros 3 Visual AI is 99.9999% accurate 2 Fast cross-browser test execution 2 AI & ML eliminate false positives (vs. pixel-based)) 2 Test against multiple browsers, viewports, and devices 2 Augments any testing framework - easy to implement Cons 2 Lot of bugs 2 Problems with integration 2 Ambiguous 2 Colours with small contrast diff are not identified 2 Mismatched image test results
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	GitHub CircleCI Slack Jenkins OpenCV Cypress Travis CI Azure DevOps Jira React Storybook

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Applitools?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

Applitools vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

Visual Testing Approach: Applitools primarily focuses on visual testing, allowing users to compare screenshots for visual differences across different browser sizes and devices. On the other hand, Ghost Inspector offers traditional functional testing and also includes visual testing capabilities, but it is not as robust and feature-rich as Applitools in terms of visual testing.
Ease of Use: Applitools is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for users to set up and manage test cases. Ghost Inspector, although user-friendly as well, may require a bit more technical expertise to fully leverage its capabilities, especially when it comes to visual testing.
Integration and Compatibility: Applitools offers seamless integration with popular testing frameworks and CI/CD tools, making it a preferred choice for teams already using such tools. Ghost Inspector also provides integration options, but it may not be as extensive as Applitools, which could be a deciding factor for teams heavily reliant on integrations.
Scalability: Applitools is designed to handle large-scale test automation projects efficiently, thanks to its highly scalable infrastructure and advanced parallel testing capabilities. While Ghost Inspector can also handle scalability, it may not be as optimized for larger projects compared to Applitools.
Customization and Flexibility: Applitools provides a high level of customization options, allowing users to tailor their testing processes according to their specific requirements. Ghost Inspector, while flexible in its own right, may have certain limitations in terms of customization and flexibility compared to Applitools.

Applitools vs Ghost Inspector

Overview