StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Argo vs Codefresh

Argo vs Codefresh

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codefresh
Codefresh
Stacks64
Followers111
Votes47
Argo
Argo
Stacks761
Followers470
Votes6

Argo vs Codefresh: What are the differences?

Key differences between Argo and Codefresh

Argo and Codefresh are both popular continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools used in software development and deployment processes. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. User Interface: Codefresh offers a user-friendly interface with an intuitive design and easy navigation. It provides a drag-and-drop editor for building pipelines and a visual dashboard for monitoring pipeline stages. On the other hand, Argo has a more technical interface with a YAML-based configuration. Developers with more experience in working with YAML may find Argo's interface more suitable for their needs.

  2. Integration Capabilities: Codefresh offers seamless integration with various popular version control systems (VCS) like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing developers to easily connect their repositories and trigger pipelines. Argo, on the other hand, focuses more on Kubernetes integration, providing features like parallel execution of workflows, scheduling jobs, and managing resource allocation in a Kubernetes cluster.

  3. Workflow Automation: Argo provides a powerful workflow engine that allows users to orchestrate complex workflows with dependencies, loops, branching, and conditionals. It supports advanced features like retries, artifact passing, and dynamic parameterization. Codefresh also supports workflow automation, but its capabilities are comparatively limited, focusing more on simpler pipeline configurations.

  4. Community Support: Argo has a growing community with active contributors and regular updates. It is an open-source project with a public roadmap and a collaborative development model. Codefresh, on the other hand, has a more established community with extensive documentation, support forums, and customer success resources. It also offers premium support options and enterprise-grade features.

  5. Pricing Model: Codefresh offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of active pipelines and monthly active users. It provides a free tier with limited features and paid plans for higher usage. Argo, being an open-source project, is free to use without any licensing costs. However, additional costs may be incurred for infrastructure resources required to run Argo workflows in a Kubernetes cluster.

In summary, Argo and Codefresh differ in terms of user interface, integration capabilities, workflow automation, community support, pricing model, and target audience. Developers seeking a more technical interface, Kubernetes-focused integration, and powerful workflow automation may prefer Argo, while those looking for an intuitive UI, extensive VCS integration, and community support may opt for Codefresh. Ultimately, the choice between the two tools depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codefresh
Codefresh
Argo
Argo

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).

Instant Dev, test and feature preview environments: Enables all team members to run any image as a standalone or composition for feature preview, manual testing, bug reproduction and more. Collaborate on features before pushing them into staging and production.; Testing with every step: Configure your pipeline to run integration and unit tests with every step; Instantly test all code changes in the Codefresh build system before pushing to staging & production. Run integration, unit tests in parallel.; 360° view of Docker images: View commit info, test results and build logs for all images; Manage Docker image labels and status, comment and see new feature branches; search and filter based on any attribute.; Out-of-the-box Docker buildpack for all technologies: Seamlessly package your code in a Docker image. Quickly associate a Dockerfile with your repo by selecting the repository technology stack (Java, Node, PHP, etc.). Codefresh then adds a template for Dockerizing apps.; View and Access Running Container Logs: Access each container log directly from within the Codefresh platform. This lets you easily perform root-cause analysis on failed services and allows you to see logs in high debug model level.; Support for Docker Compose 1 & 2: Manage your Docker Compose file natively in one place, with support for both Docker Compose versions 1 and 2. Use a built-in wizard to write Docker Compose files quickly.; YAML file support: Customize and easily define your pipeline steps using a codefresh.yml file.
DAG or Steps based declaration of workflows;Artifact support (S3, Artifactory, HTTP, Git, raw);Step level input & outputs (artifacts/parameters);Loops;Parameterization;Conditionals;Timeouts (step & workflow level);Retry (step & workflow level);Resubmit (memoized);Suspend & Resume;Cancellation;K8s resource orchestration;Exit Hooks (notifications, cleanup);Garbage collection of completed workflow;Scheduling (affinity/tolerations/node selectors);Volumes (ephemeral/existing);Parallelism limits;Daemoned steps;DinD (docker-in-docker);Script steps
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
761
Followers
111
Followers
470
Votes
47
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Fastest and easiest way to work with Docker
  • 7
    Great support/fast builds/awesome ui
  • 6
    Great onboarding
  • 5
    Freestyle build steps to support custom CI/CD scripting
  • 4
    Robust feature-preview/qa environments on-demand
Cons
  • 1
    Expensive compared to alternatives
  • 1
    Questionable product quality and stability
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Autosinchronize the changes to deploy
  • 1
    Online service, no need to install anything
Integrations
Quay.io
Quay.io
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
BinTray
BinTray
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Codefresh, Argo?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana