StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure App Service vs Heroku

Azure App Service vs Heroku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks312
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure App Service and Heroku are both cloud platforms that offer a range of services for developing, deploying, and managing web applications. While they share some similarities, they also have several key differences.

  1. Scalability: Azure App Service provides scalable infrastructure and automatically adjusts resources based on demand, allowing applications to handle increased traffic without manual intervention. Heroku, on the other hand, offers scalability through dynos, which are lightweight containers that run the application code, but developers need to manually scale dynos based on expected traffic, leading to additional management overhead.

  2. Pricing model: Azure App Service offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources consumed. This allows for better cost control as users only pay for what they use. Heroku, on the other hand, uses a dyno-based pricing model, where users are billed based on the number and size of dynos used. This can make cost prediction and optimization more complex, especially for applications with fluctuating traffic.

  3. Integration with Azure ecosystem: Azure App Service seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, such as Azure SQL Database, Azure Functions, and Azure Storage. This allows for easier development and management of complex, multi-service applications. Heroku, while providing its own set of add-ons and services, may require additional configuration and setup to integrate with other cloud services.

  4. Deployment options: Azure App Service supports various deployment options, including deploying code directly from GitHub, Azure DevOps, or using continuous deployment from local Git repositories. It also provides support for Docker containerization. Heroku, on the other hand, has a simpler deployment process and natively supports Git-based deployments. This makes it easier to get started with deploying applications quickly.

  5. Flexibility and customization: Azure App Service provides more flexibility and customization options compared to Heroku. It supports multiple programming languages, runtime stacks, and allows for fine-grained configuration of application settings and environment variables. Heroku, while supporting multiple languages, has a more opinionated platform that emphasizes convention over configuration, which may limit the level of customization available to developers.

  6. Management and monitoring capabilities: Azure App Service offers a range of management and monitoring capabilities, including autoscaling, application insights, and centralized logging. These features allow developers to monitor and troubleshoot their applications more effectively. Heroku provides similar capabilities, such as autoscaling and log aggregation, but the level of integration and built-in tooling may not be as extensive as Azure App Service.

In Summary, Azure App Service and Heroku differ in terms of scalability, pricing model, integration with the Azure ecosystem, deployment options, flexibility, and management and monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
312
Followers
20.5K
Followers
380
Votes
3.2K
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Azure App Service?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase