StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs Bitbucket Pipelines

Bamboo vs Bitbucket Pipelines

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0

Bamboo vs Bitbucket Pipelines: What are the differences?

Key differences between Bamboo and Bitbucket Pipelines

Bamboo and Bitbucket Pipelines are both popular continuous integration and deployment tools used in software development. While they offer similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two:

  1. Integration with External Tools: Bamboo provides seamless integration with a wide range of external tools such as JIRA, Bitbucket, Slack, and more. This allows for a more comprehensive and efficient workflow management. On the other hand, Bitbucket Pipelines, being a built-in feature of Bitbucket, offers a more streamlined integration with Bitbucket repository and issues.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: Bamboo offers extensive customization options, allowing users to define complex build and deployment processes through its user-friendly interface. It also supports the use of scripts and custom plugins for more flexibility. In contrast, Bitbucket Pipelines is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, providing a simpler configuration process with limited customization options.

  3. Pricing Model: Bamboo follows a traditional licensing model and is a paid tool, with the cost based on the number of build agents and concurrent jobs. In contrast, Bitbucket Pipelines offers a more cost-effective approach by providing a free tier for small teams and charging based on the number of active users for larger teams.

  4. Deployment Target Variety: Bamboo supports a wide range of deployment targets including on-premises servers, cloud platforms, and containers. It provides a seamless integration with popular deployment tools like AWS CodeDeploy, Docker, and Kubernetes. On the other hand, Bitbucket Pipelines is primarily focused on deploying to cloud platforms, with built-in support for AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.

  5. User Interface: Bamboo offers a comprehensive and feature-rich user interface, providing a visual representation of build and deployment workflows, detailed logs, and reporting. Bitbucket Pipelines, being a built-in feature of Bitbucket, shares a similar interface with Bitbucket itself, ensuring a consistent user experience for developers already using Bitbucket for version control.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Bamboo has been in the market for a longer time and has built a strong community around it, resulting in a wide range of available plugins and integrations developed by third-party vendors. Bitbucket Pipelines, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller but rapidly growing ecosystem, with fewer third-party integrations available.

In summary, Bamboo offers advanced integration capabilities, extensive customization options, and support for a wide range of deployment targets, while Bitbucket Pipelines focuses on simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and seamless integration with Bitbucket.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

-
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
Stacks
504
Stacks
350
Followers
549
Followers
368
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana