StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Sauce Labs

BrowserStack vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes438

BrowserStack vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Both of these platforms provide cloud-based testing solutions for web and mobile applications.

  1. Cross-Browser and Cross-Platform Support: BrowserStack offers a wide range of real devices along with various browsers and operating systems. They have a vast device and browser matrix to support testing on different configurations. On the other hand, Sauce Labs focuses more on virtual machines and offers a comprehensive list of browser and operating system combinations.

  2. Test Automation Support: BrowserStack is more focused on testing frameworks and provides extensive support for popular frameworks like Selenium, Appium, and Espresso. They offer easy integration with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Travis CI, and TeamCity. In contrast, Sauce Labs provides excellent support for both popular testing frameworks and CI/CD tools, but also offers its own cloud-based testing infrastructure named Sauce Labs Testrunner Toolkit.

  3. Localization and Geo Testing: BrowserStack allows users to test their applications on devices located in more than 50 countries around the globe. It offers an easy way to perform localization and geo testing by selecting the desired test location. In contrast, Sauce Labs primarily focuses on providing virtual machines and does not offer specific features for localization or geo testing.

  4. Live Interactive Testing: BrowserStack offers a feature called Live, which allows users to perform real-time testing on multiple devices through their browser. It provides a seamless experience with debugging tools, network throttling, and session sharing. On the other hand, Sauce Labs does not have a dedicated interactive testing feature similar to BrowserStack Live.

  5. Real-time Device Logs and Screenshots: BrowserStack provides real-time device logs and screenshots during test execution. This helps in debugging and identifying issues quickly. Additionally, BrowserStack also offers live video streaming of the test execution. Sauce Labs also provides device logs and screenshots, but they may not be in real-time.

  6. Support and Documentation: Both BrowserStack and Sauce Labs offer extensive support and documentation resources. BrowserStack provides 24/7 chat and email support with dedicated account managers for enterprise customers. They also have a detailed Knowledge Base and API documentation. Sauce Labs offers multiple support options including chat, email, and phone support. Their online documentation and community forums also provide valuable resources for users.

In summary, BrowserStack offers a wider range of real devices and extensive support for popular testing frameworks, making it a preferred choice for cross-browser and cross-platform testing. On the other hand, Sauce Labs focuses more on virtual machines, offers its own cloud-based testing infrastructure, and provides good support for both testing frameworks and CI/CD tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Sauce Labs

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments
Sharada
Sharada

Aug 5, 2021

Needs advice

Looking for some advice on which tool to use for mobile testing. We need the following requirements fulfilled: 1. Instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts. 2. iOS and Android devices to be available to a large team (around 60). 3. Good performance of the devices.

5.85k views5.85k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
314
Followers
2.0K
Followers
435
Votes
533
Votes
438
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Sauce Labs?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana