Overview

Buildkite

Stacks210

Followers231

Votes115

Jenkins X

Stacks147

Followers370

Votes16

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks800

Buildkite vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**

Key differences between Buildkite and Jenkins X:

1. **Architecture**: Buildkite follows a lightweight agent-based architecture where agents are responsible for executing tasks and sending logs back to the server. On the other hand, Jenkins X utilizes Kubernetes native constructs and serverless Jenkins to manage pipelines and builds, resulting in a more scalable and automated infrastructure.
   
2. **CI/CD Workflow**: Buildkite focuses primarily on Continuous Integration (CI) by providing a simple platform for running build jobs, while Jenkins X is more centered around Continuous Delivery (CD) and GitOps, incorporating features like automated deployments, environment promotion, and versioning for Kubernetes deployments.
   
3. **GitOps Integration**: Jenkins X has built-in support for GitOps practices, allowing users to manage infrastructure and deployments using version-controlled configurations stored in a Git repository. Buildkite, on the other hand, lacks native GitOps integration out of the box but can be extended through custom integrations.
   
4. **Cloud Native Development**: Jenkins X is designed for cloud-native applications and containerized environments, providing streamlined workflows for building, testing, and deploying applications on Kubernetes. Buildkite, while versatile, does not have the same level of integration and native support for cloud-native development practices.
   
5. **Community and Plugins**: Jenkins X has a robust community and ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations tailored for Kubernetes and cloud-native environments, allowing users to easily extend and customize the platform. Buildkite, although extensible through plugins and webhooks, may have limitations in terms of community support and available integrations.
   
6. **Ease of Use**: In terms of user experience, Buildkite is known for its simplicity and minimalistic design, making it easy to set up and use for basic CI/CD needs. Jenkins X, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its Kubernetes-centric approach and more comprehensive feature set.

In Summary, the key differences between Buildkite and Jenkins X lie in their architecture, focus on CI/CD workflows, GitOps integration, cloud-native development support, community ecosystem, and ease of use.

🔥 Trending in Continuous Integration on StackShare

Everdone Continuous Integration

Everdone

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Buildkite, Jenkins X

Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

Fast SBT builds (caching)
Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
Everything as code

Ease of use

181k views181k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite	Jenkins X
CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.	Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes
Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO	Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 800
Stacks 210	Stacks 147
Followers 231	Followers 370
Votes 115	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Great customer support 17 Github integration 16 Easy to use 16 Easy setup 12 Simplicity	Pros 7 Kubernetes integration 5 Scripted Pipelines 4 GitOps Cons 1 Complexity
Integrations
Slack GitHub Docker GitLab Heroku HipChat Bitbucket Git GitHub Enterprise TestFlight	Kubernetes macOS Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Fedora

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.