CDAP vs Singer: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code outlines the key differences between CDAP and Singer for website implementation.

1. **Architecture**: CDAP is an integrated data application platform that provides a unified view of data for processing and analytics, while Singer is a data ingestion framework that focuses on extracting data from various sources and loading it into data warehouses or lakes.
2. **Scalability**: CDAP is designed for enterprise-level scalability, offering features like data governance, security, and data lineage, whereas Singer is more lightweight and suitable for smaller data integration tasks.
3. **Data Transformation**: CDAP enables users to transform and enrich data within the platform using its built-in tools, whereas Singer primarily focuses on extracting and loading data with minimal transformation capabilities.
4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: CDAP has a rich ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality for various data processing tasks, while Singer relies on a plugin-based architecture for connecting to different data sources and destinations.
5. **Real-time Processing**: CDAP supports real-time data processing and streaming capabilities, making it suitable for applications that require low latency, whereas Singer is more suited for batch processing jobs.
6. **Community Support**: CDAP has strong community support and active development, with a dedicated team behind the project, while Singer, although widely used, may have limited support and resources for troubleshooting and enhancements.

In Summary, the key differences between CDAP and Singer lie in their architecture, scalability, data transformation capabilities, plugin ecosystem, real-time processing support, and community backing.